posted
Please tell me what you think. Do you consider the ladies that post their photos here all to be models or are there catagories of contributors such as professional and/or amature? I myself am not a foot model. I was wondering if all lady-contributors are considered 'models'.
Posts: 51 | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
I would also consider all of them to be models. To me, the terms "professional" and "amateur" don't really apply and it's not something I really put much stake in as to whether or not it determines if the pictures are good or bad or if I like them or not. It's really a non-factor to me.
-------------------- "I like feet... A lot!" Posts: 2167 | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- quote: ---------------------------------- posted by Andy - Laa: my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
my dad always told me a model is just a cheap imitation of the real thing i'd say contributors myself, and beautiful ones at that.
Posts: 1290 | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
I suppose that the wonderful women who show off their feet here would fall into a general category of "model". The fact that, for examples, Silvia Saint or Mya Diamond are paid to pose doesn't diminish the beauty of their feet. Though, I must admit that, at least for me, the gals that contribute photos of their feet simply because they know that it will thrill those that come (did I spell that right?) to this site...well, they have a special place in my heart and loins.
Posts: 5067 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Tongue]](tongue.gif)
i'd say contributors myself, and beautiful ones at that.
