posted
i was sitting at work, saw two nail example and thought of Wu's. one was finger nails.. the other was toenails.
so.. when it comes to length, much has been discussed except this.. which length is most condusive to color? by that, is a longer nail more appealing with or without color.. vs. a shorter nail?
after much deliberation.. i figured the longer the nail, the more likely it will need color to make it look as appealing as it's shorter counter-part.. what say you?
RPM
p.s. there comes a point in length where color nolonger is optional to me.. and usually at that length.. hose is harder to pull off also.. and same for heels too!
posted
Color is a must for longer nails; it hides the flaws acquired during the slow growth process and looks neater. I can take or leave color for shorter nails.
-------------------- Foot Sniffers Local 151 Posts: 200 | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
for me, not color looks good if the nail is long. when they get that long, its turn off and actually, i think color would just draw attention to it and make it worse for me.
quote:Originally posted by Below_the_Ankles: Color is a must for longer nails; it hides the flaws acquired during the slow growth process and looks neater. I can take or leave color for shorter nails.
------------------ Is this the "Below_The_Ankles" that used to run the web site of the same name?
-------------------- Help me...I'm sinking! Posts: 1054 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm not a big fan of long toe nails (don't want to cut my tongue when I suck the toes) but as long as they are not too long I like them bare or polished.
Posts: 336 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
