posted
dude i dont know what i did. i tried posting a new topic actually last night but i was super tanked and then i failed trying to fix it. my bad!
Posts: 93 | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
As with anything ever i dont care about the resolution... i care about the quality. i'd take a high bitrate SD vid over badly compressed HD (which is what Youtube uses) any day of the week. or month!
Posts: 230 | Registered: Jan 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by temp1234: As with anything ever i dont care about the resolution... i care about the quality. i'd take a high bitrate SD vid over badly compressed HD (which is what Youtube uses) any day of the week. or month!
Quite true.
I can't be the only guy in the world that thinks MOST (not all) stuff you see on a high-def TV...is stretched and shitter than an SD TV!?
posted
If given the choice between an HD version or non-HD version of the same clip, I will always pick HD.
But I won't simply choose a foot fetish clip over a different foot fetish clip simply because one is HD and another is not. There are some amazing masterbatory moments I have with clips that are not in HD simply because the nature of the content excites me so much as opposed to the high quality of the encoding.
The most important things to me are the woman, her feet, how hot they are, and how she reacts/interacts using her feet.
HD is a side benefit for me. I do not have an HD fetish yet. I have a foot fetish first, then maybe an HD fetish next.