posted
Was anyone ever a member of her site? I've seen all her free galleries and there's not one tit, nor one flash of pink. I'm starting to think she's a dude. A lot of her photos are suspect.
Posts: 10 | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by rokken315: Was anyone ever a member of her site? I've seen all her free galleries and there's not one tit, nor one flash of pink. I'm starting to think she's a dude. A lot of her photos are suspect.
I wasn't aware that flashing your boobs or vag was a requirement to prove that you're female.
Otherwise, a lot of the galleries on this very site would also be suspect.
posted
Wow you must have insanely high standards for women. How can you think she's a man? I think she's gorgeous and clearly a woman. Why don't you show us some photos you think are suspect because left to my own conclusions I would say there is no question as to her gender.
posted
I don't see how it's possible for anyone to think, even for a moment, that this girl is a "dude". I see nothing even remotely "male" about her.
If you want to see this model's entire body nude, that may be your desire...but that doesn't make her suspect as a pretender...it just means you're not finding what you want to see. No more and no less.
Finally, it goes without saying that if there was a model out who was actually a "dude" and whose idea of a site business plan, as it were, was to trick people into joining by posing as a woman, only for them to find out "she" was actually a guy...well, stated simply, you'd be hearing about it all over all kinds of adult-site forums and a 2-second Google search would find the reports from disgruntled members.
But perhaps the most telling and obvious point is that her site billing company is CCBill, and CCBill has does not and has not ever allowed willfully and obviously bogus sites as clients. Ask anyone who uses CCBill (myself included) how stringent their approval standards are, and how nit-picky they can be in their site-approval inspections.
posted
I never made a solid accusation, just said I was a little suspicious.
My standards aren't ridiculously high, I think true tere is an 11 out of 10.
Just wanted to know if anyone was a member of her website and seen her business... Some of her photos started to seem a little creatively composed after looking through the free galleries.
Posts: 10 | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Man....that is a tough one. While pretty, she doesn't ooze femininity like some women do. I've seen prettier men. I can't say. I won't say. She's not my type anyway.
GQ
-------------------- If she won't indulge your fetish, I bet you that cuter, smarter girl across the bar will. Lets go find out. Posts: 1877 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Sorry if I came across as giving you crap, that really wasn't my intention. I just meant that out of the photos I saw and posted I don't know how you can think that, but if you show us the photos that you thought were suspect or creatively composed perhaps we'd all be able to make a better judgement.
-------------------- If she won't indulge your fetish, I bet you that cuter, smarter girl across the bar will. Lets go find out. Posts: 1877 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
She is hot, hot, hot!!!!...And all woman!..lol
-------------------- ...Flawless and Perfect in every way...When I grow up..I'M MOVING TO BRAZIL...lol Posts: 507 | Registered: Dec 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Just playing devil's advocate... what makes a woman? Genotype? Phenotype? It amuses me that you say TrueTere is an 11/10 (meaning you find her attractive), why does that change if she's actually a man (whatever that means)? Even the most rigid scientific definitions of sex aren't binary... look up "Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome" or "Caster Semenya" for some food for thought.
Posts: 484 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
