posted
Toes are definetly the first for me. I don't know why, but I find soles more attractive when the woman is in jeans, formal, or any kind of pants really. I find soles to be the sexiest when a woman is in flip flops and pants and as she walks the sole comes up at the arch. So are far as a lot of sole pics I come across where the model isn't in pants, it's about the tops first. To me the tops and how soft or raw they look make the foot. The softer and rawer, the sexier.
Posts: 206 | Registered: Feb 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
I feel this way about foot only pics with no face.I like face+feet/sole(s) in the camera[Dominant POV] both face+feet in clear view. I sometimes see nice looking "Foot only" pics but because i have no idea who the feet belong to i don't bother commenting.I need to see the face of who the feet belong to.
-------------------- JURARRI 818 says: I think all latin american countries have beautiful feet, also the natural beauty that some womens feet come with, i feel is present all over latin america. Posts: 3262 | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Toe-tally agree with Detroit. The only reason not to show toes would be if they are extremely nasty looking.
I'm a toe guy and so are thousands of customers/members of my store and website. I also really like soles and even tend to shoot a bit more sole-photos (about 60% because it is easier to include the face), but toes really do it for me. I can't really understand websites that only show soles (and never show any toes). Seems a little stupid because they are missing out on thousands of customers. And sometimes you can see a slight glimpse of the model's pedicured toes but the photographer is just too damn focused on soles and doesn't even consider taking at least one picture from a top-view That is quite frustrating for us toe-guys.
posted
I prefer soles by a mile, but like to see at least one or two top shots as well. If I don't like the tops, then it usually doesn't matter if the soles are pretty or not, because I want both to look good.
This is almost always true regarding faces as well. It is very rare that I can fully appreciate a pair of feet without a face to put them into proper context. Oh, and I need to actually see a photo that includes the face and feet in the same shot. If I see a photo set (or Instagram account) with a face pic here or there, lots of feet photos, but no snapshots that show both together, I keep it moving...
posted
I have always wondered if it was a universal fact that a majority of footguys prefer soles to tops.
I agree that it appears here at Wu's the vocal majority prefer soles and thus a majority of the picture posts are skewed towards soles.
For me the perfect foot (which is probably 2% to 3% of women) have perfectly tapered toes from big toe to pinkie. Many very pretty feet are disqualified from the perfect category due to a mismatched pinkie toe. The nail beds on the toes need to be wide and the pinkie nail needs to be symetrically correct with the other toenails.
There is no way I personally can judge if a feet are attractive without seeing the tops.
So for the posters on here or any other free website the results posted will most certainly depict their specific likes. I would like to thank all of the people that share their images on here it is the reason that many of us are Wu's regulars.
A little diversity makes the world go around so for you sole guys throw us tops guys a picture or two in your sole sets every now and then.
Posts: 127 | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
DeTrOiT - I agree 100% and would appreciate seeing more toe shots as well. I can't appreciate a foot without seeing those toes.
Posts: 237 | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
For me, it's all about the soles. I'm extremely picky with what I like for toes so it's hard to find ones I enjoy. Soles are easy for me to enjoy. Hardly ever are there soles I don't like.
quote:Originally posted by Iowas foot slave: For me, it's all about the soles. I'm extremely picky with what I like for toes so it's hard to find ones I enjoy. Soles are easy for me to enjoy. Hardly ever are there soles I don't like.
pretty much sums up the way i feel as well. i do love all aspects of the female foot but soles will always be my number 1. it is really interesting to see all of our likes and dislikes.
-------------------- A brotha with a serious love of feet. Posts: 1787 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hate to tell you this man, but I feel the same way. I hate seeing some toes and spread out toes and soles where they have the toes pointing upward and no sole shots. I understand your position to get a complete view of the foot as desired. But you have certain people, and yes I'm one of them who have certain preferences about feet. I'm a sole lover and I love wrinkles, but I don't see scrunched soles enough on here, so to your rant I do take partial offense....lol. If you don't like what you see, then start posting what you want to see then. That's all that I can say about that, but for me, it will always and forever be wrinkled soles for me...
Posts: 469 | Registered: Sep 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by tyvianc: Hate to tell you this man, but I feel the same way. I hate seeing some toes and spread out toes and soles where they have the toes pointing upward and no sole shots. I understand your position to get a complete view of the foot as desired. But you have certain people, and yes I'm one of them who have certain preferences about feet. I'm a sole lover and I love wrinkles, but I don't see scrunched soles enough on here, so to your rant I do take partial offense....lol. If you don't like what you see, then start posting what you want to see then. That's all that I can say about that, but for me, it will always and forever be wrinkled soles for me...
quote:Originally posted by screwhead20:
quote:Originally posted by tyvianc: If you don't like what you see, then start posting what you want to see then.
Nail on the head
I ask myself what this has to do with the original question/request from Detroit?
He asked for photographers to include at least one photo of toes between the hundreds and hundreds of sole shots that don't show any toe shots at all. That's not too much to ask for, is it? He didn't say only to shoot toes and not include any more sole shots. And I agree with him 110%. If your model goes to the trouble of getting her nails pedicured then at least have the courtesy to take a couple of toe pictures. You can still shoot an additional 300 sole photos in various poses (wrinkles, smooth, dirty, clean, whatever) for the sole lovers, but take some toe pics for us toe-lovers. Seems like common sense to me
[ November 29, 2012, 08:09 AM: Message edited by: Hal ]
quote:Originally posted by tyvianc: Hate to tell you this man, but I feel the same way. I hate seeing some toes and spread out toes and soles where they have the toes pointing upward and no sole shots. I understand your position to get a complete view of the foot as desired. But you have certain people, and yes I'm one of them who have certain preferences about feet. I'm a sole lover and I love wrinkles, but I don't see scrunched soles enough on here, so to your rant I do take partial offense....lol. If you don't like what you see, then start posting what you want to see then. That's all that I can say about that, but for me, it will always and forever be wrinkled soles for me...
quote:Originally posted by screwhead20:
quote:Originally posted by tyvianc: If you don't like what you see, then start posting what you want to see then.
Nail on the head
I ask myself what this has to do with the original question/request from Detroit?
He asked for photographers to include at least one photo of toes between the hundreds and hundreds of sole shots that don't show any toe shots at all. That's not too much to ask for, is it? He didn't say only to shoot toes and not include any more sole shots. And I agree with him 110%. If your model goes to the trouble of getting her nails pedicured then at least have the courtesy to take a couple of toe pictures. You can still shoot an additional 300 sole photos in various poses (wrinkles, smooth, dirty, clean, whatever) for the sole lovers, but take some toe pics for us toe-lovers. Seems like common sense to me
Hal, You got Bro...I'm saying exactly that!...If you are a Soles guy and you want to show 100 pics of the soles...I'm just asking for 1 or 2 pics of the toes, arches, Achilles/ ankle and even the legs...I find all of these areas sexy and important..BUT THE TOES AND SOLES ARE A MUST BRO..You have got to show both and If the toes are ugly...LET ME SEE THEM...Why would I settle for ugly ass toes and say,"Her soles look delicious.."...Honestly..outside of the maintenance and up keep part AND THE SHAPE OF THE TOES FROM THE BOTTOM...I would say that..."SOLES ARE UNEVENTFUL"...lol...But that's just my opinion...This wasn't a debate about toes or soles...BUT, I HAVE ADDED A POLL FOR THAT...
Battle of the TOE Guys....vs...SOLE Guys...
Let the fight between the 2 Tribes began...lmao
[ November 30, 2012, 12:36 PM: Message edited by: DeTrOiT ]
-------------------- ...Flawless and Perfect in every way...When I grow up..I'M MOVING TO BRAZIL...lol Posts: 507 | Registered: Dec 2009
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
That is quite frustrating for us toe-guys.
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
Nail on the head![[Wink]](wink.gif)
