quote:Originally posted by Michael Pitt: nobody is more guilty of this than women, they always take pictures of random people without their permission
that's what you get in a smart phone world
quote:Originally posted by nodes: When a woman has a crush on a man if she is left alone with a garment of his, for example a shirt, she is likely to sneak in a whiff. Meanwhile, 'non foot guys' are notorious for secretly smelling panties and bras. Apparently, secretly smelling objects transcends the foot community.
Coryr,
Feet are not socially regarded as private parts. Men and women are free to expose their feet as much as they want. For example, take public breast feeding. The reason there is an issue regarding it is because it has to do with a woman's private part.
Exactly. On another forum with a thread topic that was similar to this, someone said that they lived with a female friend of theirs who had an affinity for construction workers, and she would constantly upload candid pictures of men working on building and doing construction because she found that hot.
There are probably tons of girls out there snap chatting their friends images of guys they see and like the look of. I’ll bet it’s probably even happened to guys on this forum without their knowledge.
Posts: 1326 | Registered: Feb 2013
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dear sir, persons still capable of civilized discussions like you provide a badly needed relief from widespread arrogance and bad manners on social media (not only on this forum, but also on other foot-themed ones, on Facebook etc.). I do not see our exchange as an argument (so no winners and losers), and believe me.. I don't see myself as better or worse than other people.. I am just myself.. The Feetosopher! All the best from sunny Italy!
quote:Originally posted by nodes: Feetosopher, you seems to be a very reasonable dude and thanks for being respectful. I agree we both said our piece to each other and we can leave it at that. My hat is off to you. Keep in mind that I literally said that you are a better man than me and that in the end you are correct so you technically won the argument.
posted
Without the persons face it´s anonymous feet. The problem being then? But i guess it´s a bit creepy or something. I´ve got to think a little on it.
IP: Logged |
posted
I take pics of feet if they are really sexy. Just think of it. Pretty much EVERY PLACE now has you on film. So I really don't care about any backlash of taking pics of feet. It's just feet, very harmless.
Posts: 194 | Registered: Oct 2016
| IP: Logged |
posted
I see nothing wrong with candids. I do it constantly and I don't consider myself a perv at all. It isn't illegal either. Feet are visible so I don't see the big deal. Now upskirt is another story at least for me. You have to go out of the way to film that and clothing is covering that area. Feet are out in the open. If you think its wrong that is cool. Don't look at them or record them and all is well.
Posts: 84 | Registered: Nov 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
i think filminq feet without the face is acceptable, as lonq as the face is not there. afterall, capturinq feet pics without her face is not illeqal at all.
Posts: 299 | Registered: Apr 2017
| IP: Logged |
posted
Would I do it? No I would not. It’s legal(at least where I live),so if someone wants to do it ,that’s their right. For the people who have issues with it. I guess you never look at real candid pictures and videos online.
Posts: 177 | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
![[Joint]](graemlins/joint.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
