Yeah, he probably settled that first case because he was innocent then, too.
Let's face it: Jackson is a PEDOPHILE. Just because they had a reasonable doubt does NOT mean he did not at least try to diddle the cancer-kid. Don't get me wrong, the kid's mom pimped him out with the hopes of cashing in, she is a sick bitch. He still had a fucked up childhood, thanks to Joe, and grew up to think it is somehow O.K. to share a bed with little boys. Other people's little boys. (A kid has a nightmare, and runs to mommy and daddy, no biggie, even mommy and mommy or daddy and daddy for that matter,)
Mistress, would you send a your boy to MJ's house? Unattended sleepover? In the same bed? Drinking wine? I'm not here to debate, just to ask you if you would feel ok with MJ cuddling your child.
Answer me, dammit!!!! LOL
-------------------- I know when I'm licked... all over. Posts: 401 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
id like to post my opinion on this issue and ill say it upfront i have no evidence for my theory but so many other theorys have been thrown out there without any evidence so lets call this a scenario...if you dont agree with me i dont expect you to anyway but allow me to get it off my chest.
thats where i think it all started.........^^^^^
i know the picture is small....but please can anyone name someone from that group who is more successful than michael jackson?
cyndi lauper? stevie wonder? kenny rogers?
were looking at a group of people who were on thier way out of the spotlight.michael stands apart while sitting at the same time...on his newly aquired throne of pop.
heres little michael...little jackson five michael who had been just as famous as these other people for the most part with his families group...but unlike them had a bedtime curfew.i imagine he dreamed of the day of being able to perform with some of these people.....and dreamed of the day he would walk into a room filled with said people...and be the absolute top dog."we are the world" was probobly michaels coolest day.
the thing is...it was for a charity.those who were less fortunate benefited rom this...so to top it all of...he got to feel good about himself.this is why i imagine the pop star reeked with happiness during this whole situation.
the charities saw this.they saw the most powerul man in music,utterly overtaken with joy.they saw the wealthiest man in the room as the happiest man in the room.and what did they do?
they threw cancer kids in his face from there on out.here we go...we have kids that need help...we have an ultra rich pop star who is apparently eating this up.lets show him the pain and agony these children are going through...lets show him a childhood he could never dream of.......he is basically ours from here on out.
what exactly could michael do? now he has every kid with lymphoma from down syndrome being shoved in his face and meanwhile he has to write songs that the regular public will buy.he cant exactly say...you know what...thats enough charity....i need to get back to work.why dont you go ask huey or kenny to help you out.no he couldnt do that could he?
so what does he do? HE BUILDS A FUCKING AMUSEMENT PARK FOR THEM!
uh oh...that was awesome of you michael....you did it on your own land and guess what...they aint going nowhere now.
so yeah...now he is stuck with a bunch of kids running around his mansion...how many other stars do that? none...you know why...because they were never as big as michael....in fact the only one who has ever been as big as michael is dead...and ironically..when michael thought about a love interest...someone who might understand him,he went after the daughter of that man.michael likes chicks.
so why is it boys? wel...he cant exactly have sleepovers with little girls now can he? no that would look bad......and funny enough...the little boy thing didnt look very bad for him for a long time.why? well in my opinion its because it wasnt bad...heres some seriously sad case children...being shoved in his face left and right....he basically got guilted in to becoming a 13 yr old boy all over again.the sleepovers? probobly no different than when i rode the bus home with my friend lisa in 6th grade and slept over there instead of going home.
you know what lisa and i did...we wathched her older brothers porn...drank her dads beer when everyone was asleep...and prank called all the hot boys in our class...and finally fell asleep watching MTV...and heres the kicker...we never molested each other.
of course youll say he looks wierd....so i ask you...if it were maryln manson..robert smith of the cure..any opther male musician who changes his appearance living the life of a rockstar..would you also think right away that they had done something to little boys? of course you would...because they look wierd...i thier going to be hanging around little boys like that...they should look normal...fuck./...they should look like a fucking priest...because a priest would never do anything to a little boy right.just a wierd looking rock star with money.
heres what i think michael is guilty of...being sympathetic...and loosing his appeal to the population...thus album sales.
there was nothing about michael and little boys..even when he had macauly on his videos in 92.he had an amusement park for them back then too.......he also had just put out another album which went straight to the top...and even regular local tv stations were playing his videos in between sitcoms! how often has that ever happened?
but uh oh....he puts out a compilation album and it flops....looks like his reign is over...looks like 40 is too old for pop...looks like someones about to retire and try and have some peace and quiet and maybe raise his children...maybe not have the time money or energy to have a sad case kid dropped off at the mansion to play "big brother/savior/treatment provider".......but "OMG....what about all those kids back in the day he helped...he helped them so much...and now he is going to retire and not help my cancer son? screw that...were going after him....i dont care wether he did anything to my son or not...he OWES us!"
the moral of my thought? michael should have said fuck em....because thats what they came back trying to say he did.
posted
Tucsontoes, Sorry, but having cancer kids "pushed in your face" doesnt mean you sleep with them, give them wine, etc..Fact is he admitted to sleeping int he same bed with him. Quite different from your childhood experience you mentioned because there is one little detail you are forgetting. He IS A GROWNUP! Sorry but there is what is apporpriate and what is not. It is simply not appropriate for a grown man to be sharing a bed with little boys no matter how "sympathetic" he supposedly is. If I had a bunch of young boys over to my house and shared a bed with them I weould be dragged out of my home in handcuffs the next day and rightfully so. I dont care so much that he "looks wierd," my friend, he IS wierd. Nobody was "shoved" in his face, I dont recall him ever being forced to do anything including having a wonderland ranch on his home property, he did these things of free will. Sounds like a classic case of "lets blame the victims"
Posts: 371 | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by tucsontoes: so why is it boys? wel...he cant exactly have sleepovers with little girls now can he? no that would look bad...
Of course it would. And having sleepovers with little boys is SO much better.
quote:of course youll say he looks wierd....so i ask you...if it were maryln manson..robert smith of the cure..any opther male musician who changes his appearance living the life of a rockstar..would you also think right away that they had done something to little boys?
People don't think Michael does stuff with little boys because he looks wierd. People think he does stuff with little boys because he sleeps with them. If the other "rockstars" you mentioned slept with little boys I'm sure people would assume the same thing.
-------------------- WhiteMalesAnonymous.com - A survival guide for white males living in the U.S. Posts: 105 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
