quote:Originally posted by kingler: The US does need stricter gun laws. In the same way you need a license for a vehicle, why not a weapon? In the same way that you have a heavy vehicle license you need to retake a test to prove your mentally fit, physically able and capable, why not for heavier firearms?
Now this I can agree on. I got my carry permit a year ago so if it's anything like that then ok. Not just "ban all guns."
-------------------- And today we're all brothers Tonight we're all friends A moment of peace in a war that never ends Posts: 1014 | Registered: Jul 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
They can't even correctly test, run and maintain the vehicle licensing process through a gov't agency (DMV), what makes you think they can do the same with the tracking of people with guns?
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: They can't even correctly test, run and maintain the vehicle licensing process through a gov't agency (DMV), what makes you think they can do the same with the tracking of people with guns?
Well, whether it works or not, I figure if having to get a license to buy guns will shut the libtards up then I'll take it. I'd rather that happen than any guns getting banned.
-------------------- And today we're all brothers Tonight we're all friends A moment of peace in a war that never ends Posts: 1014 | Registered: Jul 2010
| IP: Logged |
bluetoelover
unregistered
posted
Yeah a National Firearm registry FAILED miserably here in Canada... I agree with the strict licensing/testing and retesting suggestion as well. I personally have my PAL, it covers both restricted and non-restricted weapons(anywhere from a .38 up to an long gun) and it took me two days(one day course for each).
IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
