quote:Originally posted by 2nd. To God In Power: This is EXACTLY why TOES are THE indicating factor if the lady has sexy feet overall or not. The soles DOES NOT determine if the lady has sexy feet. SOLES end up being footjobable IF the TOES are sexy. Therefore, that lady you just posted does not have sexy feet. The shape of her toes and the corns to top it all off is just a BIG NO.
And www.afw4u.com, how much money are you willing to bet that I, myself, would NOT go anywhere near those feet that was posted?
Count me in. I'm not a "hypocrite" that dislikes those feet but if given a chance would jump on them.
Sorry, not that hard up.
-------------------- Like my avatar pic? Apparently Imageshack loves female feet too! Posts: 517 | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by 2nd. To God In Power: This is EXACTLY why TOES are THE indicating factor if the lady has sexy feet overall or not. The soles DOES NOT determine if the lady has sexy feet.
Not if you like soles more than toes/tops.
But hey, nice try.
Posts: 2828 | Registered: Jun 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Not going to comment on her feet, as others have already covered that. But I will say that I agree with those that said the toes make the foot. They absolutely do; for example, it's the toes that contain all the details - how are they shaped (long, short, stubby, chunky, thin), do they generally point straight or are they crooked, are the nails of high quality (nice nailbed, nice longish nails, bitten-down nails), smoothness/roughness of the skin (though you can use this factor to judge soles, too).
Soles, are kind of just soles, on the other hand. They're either nice or they're not. Not too much middle ground. And soles would never be the determining factor for whether a foot is deemed gorgeous - that's the job of the tops, and how well pampered they are, in addition to their natural beauty (which is a must, as there's only so much you can do to enhance ugliness).
Posts: 501 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by SuckYourToes?: Not going to comment on her feet, as others have already covered that. But I will say that I agree with those that said the toes make the foot. They absolutely do; for example, it's the toes that contain all the details - how are they shaped (long, short, stubby, chunky, thin), do they generally point straight or are they crooked, are the nails of high quality (nice nailbed, nice longish nails, bitten-down nails), smoothness/roughness of the skin (though you can use this factor to judge soles, too).
Soles, are kind of just soles, on the other hand. They're either nice or they're not. Not too much middle ground. And soles would never be the determining factor for whether a foot is deemed gorgeous - that's the job of the tops, and how well pampered they are, in addition to their natural beauty (which is a must, as there's only so much you can do to enhance ugliness).
EXACTLY! You hit it right on the nose. I could never fathom how anyone could think a woman has sexy feet just because of her soles and not her toes. It's the reason why I hardly ever comment on anyone post because that's all they show is just soles.
-------------------- I'm 2nd. to God's power. I'm the semi-supreme being!
quote:Originally posted by 2nd. To God In Power: You're correct, the girl is cute, her feet are not. LOL
I totally agree, she's cute but her feet are something else, her feet totally turn me off. corns, warts, etc are not my cup of tea.
Posts: 126 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't find those feet appealing. I am a soles guy through and through, but if the toes aren't attractive, it's very difficult for me to appreciate the rest of the foot.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Hump]](graemlins/hump.gif)
![[Cry]](cry.gif)
