posted
Honestly, I dont' eroticize the feet unless I find the subject's face sexy. This rule is not just for feet but for any other part of the female body. So I think I truly have a face fetish. I don't get why if a dude or a woman finds sexy faced babe's feet sexy, it is now a foot fetish. If I find someone's eyes sexy do I have an eye fetish? If I find sexy faced babes' hands sexy do I have a hand fetish. What do you guys and ladies think?
Posts: 22 | Registered: Jan 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
then why are you a member on a footfetish forum?
-------------------- "Nina, this is my house, you work for me, and I want to suck your toes." -Big Trouble (2002) Posts: 1855 | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Personally justice44, I think you're reading too much into it. Just because you appreciate a pretty face, doesn't necessarily mean you have a face fetish. The only reason they call it a "foot fetish" is because most people (aka closed-minded ppl) consider it taboo.
-------------------- "I do believe they think I am some sort of god!" (C-3PO) Posts: 2474 | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yeah I think all people would have a face fetish. I mean if you can find a person who prefers someone with an ugly face I would be surprised. And if they did that would just mean that face is pretty to their eyes and their opinions.
Even though my girlfriend to me has a pretty face I believe now I can see a pair of feet that attract me but see they are connected to in my opinion a not so attractive person overall. Thats why I think I have a foot fetish.
Posts: 488 | Registered: Mar 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dont really understand this thread. I will say if I just see a picture of feet it does not do much for me, I need to see the whole person so I can put a face to the feet if that makes sense to really turn me on.
Posts: 94 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I know I have a foot fetish, because I'd take a so-so looking girl (won't go so far as to say ugly) with sexy feet, over a "pretty" girl with ugly feet any day.
quote:Originally posted by Five For Feet: I know I have a foot fetish, because I'd take a so-so looking girl (won't go so far as to say ugly) with sexy feet, over a "pretty" girl with ugly feet any day.
yeah but if the girl is a dog with the nicest feet ever, it just doesn't work. you need to have standards
Posts: 279 | Registered: Sep 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yup, i'm much the same. If it's a horrible looking person then I wouldn't enjoy their feet. My first girlfriend (hey I was 14 ) taught me this, haha.
When I see people posting photos of famous but ugly womens feet I do get a bit confused...
Posts: 230 | Registered: Jan 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Five For Feet: I know I have a foot fetish, because I'd take a so-so looking girl (won't go so far as to say ugly) with sexy feet, over a "pretty" girl with ugly feet any day.
exactly. Im the same.
Posts: 1130 | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by toesucker - uk: Dont really understand this thread. I will say if I just see a picture of feet it does not do much for me, I need to see the whole person so I can put a face to the feet if that makes sense to really turn me on.
I'm with you, toesucker. With only the rarest of exceptions, I need to see the rest of the woman in order to place her feet in the proper contact. However, if the model's picture set is a mixed bag (some with her face showing, some without) or I know what she looks like to begin with, that's fine.
posted
Face fetish?....I like a good blow job too!
-------------------- If she won't indulge your fetish, I bet you that cuter, smarter girl across the bar will. Lets go find out. Posts: 1877 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by toesucker - uk: Dont really understand this thread. I will say if I just see a picture of feet it does not do much for me, I need to see the whole person so I can put a face to the feet if that makes sense to really turn me on.
I'm with you, toesucker. With only the rarest of exceptions, I need to see the rest of the woman in order to place her feet in the proper contact. However, if the model's picture set is a mixed bag (some with her face showing, some without) or I know what she looks like to begin with, that's fine.
So is the girl in your avatar one of those rare exceptions FIASCo? Because I don't really need to see anything else on her, or at least what I can see is worth taking the chance. I do have standards, but the girl attached to THOSE FEET would have to be just about butt ugly for me not to get with her. I won't go so far as to say you and toesucker don't have the fetish, but you ain't got it like I got it!