With us being of an underground foot community, are we really aloud to think other fetishes are "gross." I say this because we have one of the most stereotyped fetishes.
And It really bothers me that people who aren't hurting anybody, or doing anything wrong, are shamed for this.
So here's the question I ask to you guys, do we have the right to stereotype other fetishes?
And it doesn't have to be fetishes. It can be interests, hobbies, fondness, or activities.
Again, only if it applies to these categories: 1. It is legal. 2. It is moral 3. It's not hurting anyone or living creature. 3. It doesn't damage anyone's property. 4. It's not putting anyone in danger. 5. It's not invading anyone's life to the point that they cannot avoid it if they wanted to.
[ May 02, 2014, 11:56 AM: Message edited by: Keyfeet ]
Posted by National (Member # 8568) on :
I think it's important to say right away that we perceive ourselves as serious people. We read newspapers, follow politics, and try to keep up with the new books, films, plays, and exhibitions. In our interactions with the world, in our jobs, in our tastes, opinions, and beliefs, I will speak for everyone on this forum when I say that we are substantial, complete, and serious people. Yet I can see that there is something profoundly unserious about being a foot or shoe fetishist.
Certain sexual obsessions, let us say an addiction to pain (either given or received), a taste for violation of the self or others, a compulsive attraction to children, these things carry with them a sense of scale, of drama, and of awful consequence, that a love of feet and shoes simply does not.
This is a paradox and occasionally a problem. Here we are, serious people, fallen in love for something most people are unable to take seriously. Tell people you are obsessed with bondage and prostitutes and see them react. They will express surprise or shock or disapproval, and this expression is either real or feigned. It may be only an attempt to hide their true feelings, or it could be a conditioned response, but either way there IS a definite response. They will look at you as though you are talking about something risky, edgy, and serious. But tell them you're a foot fetishist and they giggle. For them it's a joke, it's funny, not serious sex. Yet for us it is. Foot fetishism is our greatest appetite. Otherwise we wouldn't be members of this forum to begin with.
To answer your question, even if we do stereotype other fetishes, what good would that do? It hasn't been done since the day the planets started to turn. How would that change now? Besides, even though feet are our main attraction, we do like other parts of the woman's body.
I say, let them ridicule us. If it were accepted by everyone, then the mystique that rides along with our fetish will lose its aura. Everyone likes it, we will no longer stand out as people who see something special that others fail to take into consideration.
Let's take what we love most and go along with the ride.
Other than that scat fetish you spoke of, we're the next "weirdest" species according to the majority out there.
My message to anyone who makes fun of our fetish:
If you don't like the shit that you're reading, then blow me 'till your lipstick is smearing and I can see my dick disappearing.
That's all I've got for now. I'm running out of time, and I've got to get away from the computer.
Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
I am often dismayed by how judgmental many of my fellow foot fetishists and faciers are of not only other fetishes, but what other foot lovers like as well! It's like some of them need to down what others appreciate about female feet in order to feel comfortable about their own cravings.
"Yeah, I may like feet, but at least I don't like feet that smell!"
"Guys who like dirty feet are weirdos; I'm a clean feet man!"
"I like sniffing soles and sucking toes, but I'm no submissive. Not me! I'm a real he-man!"
"Buying socks? Only losers do that!"
Hey, like what you like, but that sort of thing is pretty juvenile, isn't it? I don't particularly care for feet in hose, but have never felt the need to go into a thread dedicated to that subject in order to belittle those who do. I'm not the biggest footjob fan, but i don't knock those who enjoy it by intimating that they get a charge out of seeing another guy's "business" waving around in the air.
Posted by You (Member # 2107) on :
well said fIasCO, agreed 100%
Posted by MommiesFeet (Member # 18340) on :
quote:Originally posted by You: well said fIasCO, agreed 100%
I second that!! Posted by pantyhosefoot lover (Member # 30777) on :
Keyfeet after reading what you wrote I just had to leave a message about "our" fetish as you like to call it. Well I guess it is...hehe..Anyway, I have to agree with you that there are many fetish out there that you hear about that you may think are "over the top" However I also agree that if you think something is you can say Sorry not my thing and leave it at that...As far as "our" fetish goes I believe that having a foot fetish is becoming much more excepted than say 10 years ago or more. Beacause of guys in hollywood and in different industries saying yes I like womens feet I believe that the stigma about foot fetish is not as "taboo" or wierd as it use to be. Yes you will still find your " never do anything like that virgins" to them I say fine. Your choice not to want to be apart of what we like but I just wanted to say I believe that our fetish is becoming more normal cause no matter wether you like talk show host, movies director or actors or even coutry music artist if you look you would be surprised anout what you hear and see...
Posted by Elvzz (Member # 14178) on :
Yea, really the world would be a better place without judgement of any kind!
Posted by Weekend_Warrior (Member # 2662) on :
quote:Originally posted by Keyfeet: do we have the right to stereotype other fetishes?
Absolutely not!
I'm not here to judge anyone. Who am I to tell someone what's "gross" or "too weird" for conversation? Like FIASCo stated earlier, there's no reason for me to post to another thread, just to belittle someone. One of the reasons I joined this message board was to find a place where I can express my fetish--PROUDLY--without fear of ridicule or embarrassment. Isn't that the reason we ALL joined!? Think about it. If each of us enjoyed the exact same things...this place would be pretty boring. We need diversity among the fetishes to keep it interesting.
Having said that....I don't expect anyone else to understand "WHY" I get off on sniffing women's shoes and/or their smelly feet. I don't expect others to understand why I prefer longer toes vs. stubby toes. It doesn't matter! If you're here just to make fun of other people's kinks....then you joined Wu's for the wrong reasons!!! Posted by Love2Sniff (Member # 26799) on :
quote:Originally posted by FIASCo: I am often dismayed by how judgmental many of my fellow foot fetishists and faciers are of not only other fetishes, but what other foot lovers like as well!
You're so right. I've experienced it on this board a few times and was amazed.
I like what I like and I'm happy for people who can indulge their fetish(es). Let's be glad to live in a free world where we can express our feelings and our (gross ) preferences.
Posted by feetluvr (Member # 1570) on :
Like WW said- I'm not here to judge anyone, no matter how different or "extreme" their likes or dislikes are to me personally.
When your own likes and dislikes are stereotyped and not understood it becomes (for me at least) more and more difficult to judge other folks desires. They are what they- the true likes and dislikes of that person.
Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
To each his own
Posted by A&F_FootDude_05 (Member # 2999) on :
Just like Weekend Warrior says, absolutely not.
There is one crticial fact that I learned from one of my professors in an art history course and that is "there is no such thing as normal sexuality." Posted by Eliza Durden (Member # 22995) on :
I don't think you are stereotyping or being judgmental at all.
It's just personal opinion or preference. Isn't it? Or have we lost the right to that also? Posted by coedfeet (Member # 2738) on :
So that means you guys would also be accepting of animal crushing and guys wacking off onto little kids feet..fucking yikes Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
We don't really have the right...but I do...human nature I suppose...(What's weird to US personally an all...)
Posted by manolojchoo (Member # 1257) on :
quote:Originally posted by coedfeet: So that means you guys would also be accepting of animal crushing and guys wacking off onto little kids feet..fucking yikes
Absolutely not! All sexual activities--including any type of fetish exploration--must be consensual, that is by mutual adult consent. Therefore, your examples (animal abuse and child abuse) would be considered not merely inappropriate but illegal--in fact, felonies in most states.
I have been a member of this board for a few years now, and as is the case with this thread, have never seen anyone here endorse, support, or excuse the activities you describe.
[ March 02, 2009, 02:59 PM: Message edited by: manolojchoo ]
Posted by ejc8708 (Member # 31433) on :
well how do you all feel about shemales im wondering ??
Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
Ha! I'm pretty sure that coedfeet is just kidding... At least I hope so... Of course illegal activities are a whole different ball game, and anyone involved in the ones mentioned in his post deserve to have the full weight of the law brought to bear against them.
Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
quote:Originally posted by coedfeet: So that means you guys would also be accepting of animal crushing and guys wacking off onto little kids feet..fucking yikes
i'm a person who (just like most everyone here who does not like to admit it) prefers to selectively have the right to stereotype.
additionally, when i do choose to stereotype, i prefer to do this from a position where i put myself above those being stereotyped so that I may seem better than them.
there are times when sickening fetishes like the ones you mentioned deserved to be stereotyped imo.
mind you there are probably a few other fetishes that are not illegal but i find them so appalling or disgusting that i personally stereotype them.
the reality tho is that we do have the right. i really am better than some fetishes out there even tho i do have a foot fetish myself. for one, i am not doing anything illegal and 2ndly i am not doing stuff quite as disgusting (in my opinion) LOL
Posted by You (Member # 2107) on :
personally i have the right to my opinion and preferences. if people really feel the need to openly diss or judge someone elseīs, thats their choice and at the same time says a lot about their character. i think thats really the point.
Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
quote:Originally posted by ejc8708: well how do you all feel about shemales im wondering ??
They're not my thing, but to each his/her own.
Coincidentally, i was discussing this very topic with a member of this forum last night.
I told her that I was recently contacted by someone on MySpace who said that based on my page, I was obviously biased against certain kinds of people. I was shocked, especially since ladies from all three races and of various nationalities and ethnicities are represented, and I said so. The reply was that I did not have any "special" ladies like her on my page, and that I should be open to having one pictured there or in one of the "Sign, Smile & Soles" shots I collect. (Those who have seen my customized layout will better understand this.) My immediate reaction was what I stated up top. "I have no problem with people being who they are, but my foot fetishism does not extend to those who are not female."
And I still feel that way... but our exchange did get me thinking... Among my top friends are a couple of girls who consider themselves bi-sexual and one uber foot fetish model who is a lesbian. They are beautiful, and their sexuality does not negatively impact my appreciation of their feet in any way.
Which begs the question... Did the person who sent me the message have a point? I'm not sure, but for me, it is something to ponder.
Posted by summer footgirl (Member # 12232) on :
Yah we have the right. Its called free speech (& free thoughts). Not everyones gonna agree with whatever someone else says but if anyone wonders if we have the right to say it or think it than we're all in trouble.
Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
We certainly have the right. It's unfortunate that people don't use it a bit more judiciously.
Posted by Hal (Member # 3484) on :
quote: Therefore, your examples (animal abuse and child abuse) would be considered not merely inappropriate but illegal--in fact, felonies in most states.
I certainly donīt want to start a discussion about animal crush, but unfortunately it is not illegal...especially not in the USA. There are still a few dozen websites and clip-stores up and running that show female models crushing certain types of animals. The only thing that has changed in the last decade is that it is now illegal to sell clips of mammals being crushed (cats, dogs, rabbits, etc.)
-Hal-
Posted by Michael P (Member # 1922) on :
quote:Originally posted by Keyfeet: With us being of an underground foot community, are we really aloud to think other fetishes are "gross." I say this b/c we have one of the most stereotyped fetishes.
I personally think that "fecal fetish" is gross. I just dont want girls taking dumps on me. But there are some people who love it. And I have to get over it accept it. I dn't have to love it. But I just don't feel that I have the right to call it gross.
So heres the qestion I ask to you guys, do we have the right to stereotype other fetishes?
uh yeah you have a right to think it's gross, anybody that doesn't think so is fucked in the head
you cannot compare a human body part (feet) to human waste
and who cares if we do stereotype anything? the fact of the matter is there is a lot of truth to every sterotype, if there wasn't the stereotype wouldn't exist
we all have our opinions and i'm not changing mine because somebody might get their feelings hurt
Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
I suppose I should have mentioned earlier that "stereotype" is being improperly used by some here. A stereotype is "a too-simple and therefore distorted image of a group, such as 'Football players are stupid' or 'The English are cold and unfriendly people.'" It is "a generalization, usually exaggerated or oversimplified and often offensive, that is used to describe or distinguish a group."
I think what some of us (including myself) are talking about whether or not it is right to unfairly malign others for their fetishes (or sub fetishes). If that is not what the author of the thread was putting up for discussion then I regret taking us off track.
Posted by manolojchoo (Member # 1257) on :
quote:Originally posted by Hal:
I certainly donīt want to start a discussion about animal crush, but unfortunately it is not illegal...especially not in the USA. There are still a few dozen websites and clip-stores up and running that show female models crushing certain types of animals. The only thing that has changed in the last decade is that it is now illegal to sell clips of mammals being crushed (cats, dogs, rabbits, etc.)
Good catch, Hal. That statement was meant only to refer to child abuse. (And I actually went back to edit it too!!!)
Posted by Hal (Member # 3484) on :
quote: and who cares if we do stereotype anything? the fact of the matter is there is a lot of truth to every sterotype, if there wasn't the stereotype wouldn't exist
we all have our opinions and i'm not changing mine because somebody might get their feelings hurt
How profound
-Hal-
Posted by Michael P (Member # 1922) on :
quote:Originally posted by Hal:
quote: and who cares if we do stereotype anything? the fact of the matter is there is a lot of truth to every sterotype, if there wasn't the stereotype wouldn't exist
we all have our opinions and i'm not changing mine because somebody might get their feelings hurt
How profound
-Hal-
such a profound post from you too, hal Posted by climax (Member # 6641) on :
Nope, at least thats how i feel about it, not simply because I have a fetish too or whatever, but because i find it wrong in general to ridicule or look down on someone for liking something i dont, period. That kinda attitude aint a good foundation of forming a community of people who get along and accept one another. I dont care what the next person likes, whats good to them is good to them and it aint got nothing to do with me. I always say, as long as its lawful and concentual, anything goes, just dont talk to me about it.
Posted by Keyfeet (Member # 27313) on :
well fiisco, may I ask who are the members misusing "streotype?" If it me, you can (in your mind) change the title to "Do we have to right to ridicule other fetishes?"
Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
quote:Originally posted by climax: Nope, at least thats how i feel about it, not simply because I have a fetish too or whatever, but because i find it wrong in general to ridicule or look down on someone for liking something i dont, period. That kinda attitude aint a good foundation of forming a community of people who get along and accept one another. I dont care what the next person likes, whats good to them is good to them and it aint got nothing to do with me. I always say, as long as its lawful and concentual, anything goes, just dont talk to me about it.
Well said, climax.
Posted by Eliza Durden (Member # 22995) on :
quote:Originally posted by coedfeet: So that means you guys would also be accepting of animal crushing and guys wacking off onto little kids feet..fucking yikes
Can these things really be called fetishes? I mean really!
Posted by Keyfeet (Member # 27313) on :
quote:Originally posted by FIASCo:
quote:Originally posted by climax: Nope, at least thats how i feel about it, not simply because I have a fetish too or whatever, but because i find it wrong in general to ridicule or look down on someone for liking something i dont, period. That kinda attitude aint a good foundation of forming a community of people who get along and accept one another. I dont care what the next person likes, whats good to them is good to them and it aint got nothing to do with me. I always say, as long as its lawful and concentual, anything goes, just dont talk to me about it.
Well said, climax.
you still reply to my post, where i asked you question about what you said earlier
Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
quote:Originally posted by Keyfeet: well fiisco, may I ask who are the members misusing "streotype?" If it me, you can (in your mind) change the title to "Do we have to right to ridicule other fetishes?"
Sorry i missed this, Keyfeet. Yes, I thought that's what you were asking.
Posted by Hal (Member # 3484) on :
quote:Originally posted by Eliza Durden:
quote:Originally posted by coedfeet: So that means you guys would also be accepting of animal crushing and guys wacking off onto little kids feet..fucking yikes
Can these things really be called fetishes? I mean really!
Animal crush is certainly a fetish. Pedosexuality isn`t.
-Hal-
Posted by Toetapper (Member # 6473) on :
To supplement FIASCo's definition, I would like to suggest that a stereotype is very much like a caricature; both are based in some truth but it is usually the flaws that are exaggerated (for humorous effect in the latter, not always for the former).
Keyfeet, you mention that you believe that you must "accept" it. I'm wondering what you mean by that. If you mean that you accept the fact that such sexual proclivities exist in the world, I would have to agree with you and have accepted that notion long ago.
If, however, you mean that you "accept" such fetishes as scat and animal crush to be on an equal footing, and carrying the same legitimacy, as a foot-fetish, I would have to strongly disagree. I would contend that there are certain (sexual) practices that are simply wrong and others that are undeniably unhealthy. If you are accepting these as sexual peers in the fetish world, I would have to say that you are mistaken or misled.
I never have the time to expand, anymore.
Hey Hal! Just curious, here. How did you come to the delineation between Fetish and Pedosexuality? How did you draw the line? Where is the line? I'm guessing that it is by definitions of behavior that you drew your conclusions. Just interested in your reasoning.
Posted by ejc8708 (Member # 31433) on :
wow one of my post got baned i whould just like to say some of those shemales make them selfs look better thena lot of women out there oh and i dont care if it gets ugly or not its called freedom of speech
Posted by Hal (Member # 3484) on :
quote: Hey Hal! Just curious, here. How did you come to the delineation between Fetish and Pedosexuality? How did you draw the line? Where is the line? I'm guessing that it is by definitions of behavior that you drew your conclusions. Just interested in your reasoning.
A fetish is defined as the sexual attraction towards an object, body part or a certain (inter)action. This will fit to the animal crush fetish (it is a sub-fetish of the foot/shoe/crush fetish, mixed with GTS, femdom and BDSM fetish) but it does not fit the term pedophilia.
I don`t want to turn this thread into a discussion about the definition of (or the line between) fetish/pedosexuality. It`s a really ugly subject that should have no room here. For further reading just consult the internet, there are probably loads of articles about this.
-Hal-
Posted by Five For Feet (Member # 33596) on :
They have a saying where I come from - "What you do with your dick is your business". Now, children and animals are different. They just are. But this pretty much sums it up for me, and I would never look down on someone because they are into something that doesn't necessarily float my boat. Hell, it could be something that I'm just not into.....yet!
Posted by jono86 (Member # 9142) on :
should we steroptype? No do we sterotype? yes
Its just in our nature
Posted by Michael P (Member # 1922) on :
quote:Originally posted by Toetapper:
If, however, you mean that you "accept" such fetishes as scat and animal crush to be on an equal footing, and carrying the same legitimacy, as a foot-fetish, I would have to strongly disagree. I would contend that there are certain (sexual) practices that are simply wrong and others that are undeniably unhealthy. If you are accepting these as sexual peers in the fetish world, I would have to say that you are mistaken or misled.
EXACTLY!
Posted by Hal (Member # 3484) on :
quote:Originally posted by Michael P:
quote:Originally posted by Toetapper:
If, however, you mean that you "accept" such fetishes as scat and animal crush to be on an equal footing, and carrying the same legitimacy, as a foot-fetish, I would have to strongly disagree. I would contend that there are certain (sexual) practices that are simply wrong and others that are undeniably unhealthy. If you are accepting these as sexual peers in the fetish world, I would have to say that you are mistaken or misled.
EXACTLY!
I agree that aninmal crush is wrong. But I disagree with judging fetishes by their standard of "health" (like the scat fetish). I am sure that the majority of "normal" people will also think that feet are disgusting and unhealthy...slobbering around on a woman`s sweaty, stinky and dirty feet isn`t exactly the most appetizing thought to most people. And other sub-forms of the foot fetish probably aren`t recommended by doctors either...for example ball crushing, being trampled in high-heels or other certain forms of foot-domination. I doubt this would really be considered "healthy". Also, why use the term "legitimacy"...is foot fetish now more legitimate than other fetishes? Foot fetish uber alles!?!
I certainly have to agree with the majority of posts in this interesting thread: We should tolerate, accept and maybe even try to respect other forms of sexuality/fetishes. (as long as these are done with mutual consent...so this obviously excludes pedophilia, rape, animal crush, ...) I know it may be difficult but if we (the people with fetishes) can`t even be tolerant towards other "weird" forms of sexuality, how can we expect the rest of society to ever accept us?
-Hal-
[ March 04, 2009, 12:47 AM: Message edited by: Hal ]
Posted by Toetapper (Member # 6473) on :
quote:Originally posted by Hal:
Also, why use the term "legitimacy"...is foot fetish now more legitimate than other fetishes? Foot fetish uber alles!?!
You are right it was a bad choice of words; I even hesitated before using it but could not find the more appropriate word. Still can't.
I certainly wouldn't argue that one fetish is superior to all others. What I was trying to get at is that most fetishes are, in the final analysis, harmless (foot-fetish, very likely, the most harmless). Some seemingly extreme fetishes such as bondage, if conducted lovingly and carefully, are a very healthy release.
My concern is the psychological underpinnings of such a fetish. As a practitioner of bondage, when I meet an apparently willing "bottom", I don't race her right home to my dungeon. I want to get to know her; if I get the sense that her enjoyment of it is even remotely self-destructive, it stops right there.
This leads to my problem of a choice of words. There are some fetishes that are harmless and some that are destructive, either to the possessor of the fetish or to those around them; the latter are often revealing of some serious personal problems (ball-crushing and scat are some good examples - Ted Bundy might even be better, though off-the-charts in extremity). When I said unhealthy, I didn't mean just physically.
I notice that I haven't addressed the actual topic of this thread so I'll close with a brief story:
While I was playing in a traveling C&W band, we had landed in a place that was within driving distance of one of the member's home and his wife came to pay him a visit. A number of us returned to the motel where we were staying and went to the room where we kept our booze and other diversions. There were no customary signs of "Do Not Enter" on the door so the door was opened...
Thereafter, he was always introduced as "Duct Tape Dan the Fiddlin' Man".
The moral: Expect your foibles to be exploited.
My conclusion: If you can pick on someone's faults, seize the opportunity BUT do it with care and some kindness.
Stereotype I will but I also keep in mind that I have flaws, as well.
If it is for the sake of a laugh and not ridicule, it's all fair game.
Posted by LuckyTeen (Member # 30822) on :
I think that I shouldn't judge anyone who has a fetish (providing it isn't illegal or morally wrong-they are not sane and consetual.) Isn't scat illegal though, yeah it is very, very extreme and hard to understand? Hazardous if consumed or excrement gets into the body somehow so that's edgey. Posted by Hal (Member # 3484) on :
quote:Originally posted by Toetapper: To supplement FIASCo's definition, I would like to suggest that a stereotype is very much like a caricature; both are based in some truth but it is usually the flaws that are exaggerated (for humorous effect in the latter, not always for the former).
I like that simile....
about the stereotyping other fetishes it really depends on the fetish because all fetishes are not all on the same level.
It is really hard to determine what is "right" or "wrong" when the person you think is doing "wrong" believes that he is doing "right"
Posted by Michael P (Member # 1922) on :
quote:But I disagree with judging fetishes by their standard of "health" (like the scat fetish). I am sure that the majority of "normal" people will also think that feet are disgusting and unhealthy...slobbering around on a woman`s sweaty, stinky and dirty feet isn`t exactly the most appetizing thought to most people.
yeah they might think feet are disgusting but not in the same way they would look at feces
go to the grocery store in flip flops and most won't notice nor care
go to the grocery store with shit on your shoes and notice the reaction of other people
quote:And other sub-forms of the foot fetish probably aren`t recommended by doctors either...for example ball crushing, being trampled in high-heels or other certain forms of foot-domination. I doubt this would really be considered "healthy".
i don't think these guys actually like feet, they like pain and are not typical foot guys
either way, still not the same as liking a steaming pile of shit
quote:Also, why use the term "legitimacy"...is foot fetish now more legitimate than other fetishes? Foot fetish uber alles!?!
yes it is more legitimate, tell a psychiatrist you like feet and they won't think too much of it
sure they might have some theories on it but they will say you are basically normal, just have a different taste
tell a psychiatrist you like shit they will think you should be locked in an institution
quote:I certainly have to agree with the majority of posts in this interesting thread: We should tolerate, accept and maybe even try to respect other forms of sexuality/fetishes.
why should we accept and respect somebody that likes shit in their mouth? you think because we like a BODY PART that isn't that popular we should be tolerant of a person that eats what our body wants eliminated from our body?
poop is disgusting any sane human being knows it, heck when housetraining a puppy some people put the pups nose near it's shit and even they know it's disgusting, yet dog's often lick their owners feet
i don't think people here really do respect a shit eater, they just feel like they should because they are overly nice and are insecure about something as harmless as a foot fetish, they feel they are in no position to judge
Posted by Toetapper (Member # 6473) on :
quote:Originally posted by Michael P: i don't think people here really do respect a shit eater, they just feel like they should because they are overly nice and are insecure about something as harmless as a foot fetish, they feel they are in no position to judge
A residue of "Political Correctness".
I recognize this observation might likely garner some ridicule.
Posted by Hal (Member # 3484) on :
quote: why should we accept and respect somebody that likes shit in their mouth?
This thread has certainly taken a weird twist. Before this post I had never thought about the feces-fetish before...but now that I have, I certainly have no problem with it. Hypothetically, if one of my friends were to tell me they have a coprophilia-fetish why should this disturb me? Is it my business what people do in their own beds (or whereever they do this)? No, it isn`t! Are people (or animals) being harmed against their will by this fetish? No they arenīt! I donīt have a problem with people being gay, lesbian, BDSM or being into really weird fetishes. I do find certain forms of sexuality amusing at times, but I certainly accept them.
-Hal-
Posted by manolojchoo (Member # 1257) on :
I understand that many topics here get recycled--new members, long absences from the board, etc.--but haven't we already been down this road? Just last month, in fact.
yeah the same topics are discussed every single day in different posts by different members. it gets repetitive when the discussions reach the point of: this is what i like, do you agree? people who like this or that are weirdos... i like just the feet, i dont care about what the girl looks like, etc
oh and i agree with Halīs last post
Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
Great post, Hal.
Posted by ejc8708 (Member # 31433) on :
idk i guess LeDaemon stereotypes since my post about shemale feet got deleted even tho theres pics of Cuckolds and that stuff is gay as hell
Posted by LuckyTeen (Member # 30822) on :
I guess someone can be into the brown shower or whatever it's called type thing if they are EXTREMELY submissive. My hypothesis is most people I guess would do it for the submissive rush not because they actually get off smelling waste.
I can argue though IMO I think there is one thing I could accept because; like Hal said it would be none of my business and one thing I would try and convince them not to do.
If someone wanted a girl to defecate on his leg or something, that's just very weird and I'd just be like ...ok... but if a friend told me he wanted his girl to take a dump in or around his mouth or face that IS actually very very dangerous. And I'd probably say he needs help. For his own good. But I wouldn't judge him, we all know how impossible it is to resit a fetish. It's like being gay or straight, you can't really control it.
Posted by canIsmellYourFeet (Member # 11183) on :
quote:Originally posted by manolojchoo: I understand that many topics here get recycled--new members, long absences from the board, etc.--but haven't we already been down this road? Just last month, in fact.
You said it. In fact topics like the one you quoted annoy me the most. Its like expecting someone to "explain" why they like chocolate. And to what end. If you don't "get" a fetish, do you HAVE to? Will it be the end of your world if you don't? Or can you accept people are allowed to actually like things you don't. You HAVE to understand it, and expect someone to quantify it, to give it legitimacy in your mind? And to THAT end, what makes YOU the authority they're supposed to answer to?
I mean "you" in the general sense, by the way. But I'm just saying it gets...old. But yeah, I agree with you.
Posted by Five For Feet (Member # 33596) on :
quote:Originally posted by Michael P: [QUOTE]why should we accept and respect somebody that likes shit in their mouth? you think because we like a BODY PART that isn't that popular we should be tolerant of a person that eats what our body wants eliminated from our body?
poop is disgusting any sane human being knows it, heck when housetraining a puppy some people put the pups nose near it's shit and even they know it's disgusting, yet dog's often lick their owners feet
i don't think people here really do respect a shit eater, they just feel like they should because they are overly nice and are insecure about something as harmless as a foot fetish, they feel they are in no position to judge
You do realize that a lot of people feel pretty much the same way about you and your foot fetish don't you? As matter of fact, some might not see much of a difference on the "weirdo" scale my friend. Soooo.....yeah, who ARE you to judge?
Posted by Michael P (Member # 1922) on :
quote:Originally posted by Five For Feet: QUOTE]You do realize that a lot of people feel pretty much the same way about you and your foot fetish don't you? As matter of fact, some might not see much of a difference on the "weirdo" scale my friend. Soooo.....yeah, who ARE you to judge? [/QB]
yes i do realize that and they are retards for thinking a foot in the mouth is the same as shit n the mouth
keep thinking there is nothing wrong with being a shit eater if that makes you feel like a "good person" lol Posted by Michael P (Member # 1922) on :
another thing is what would make anybody think a shit eater would be anything less than a filthy degenerate?
i'm sure some of you have seen jeff the vomit guy on the howard stern show, he is sexually turned on by people that puke on him
does he seem like a normal well adjusted guy to you? you're NOT a bad person if you say no
did the kids you knew that ate paste in elementary school turn out to be normal well adjusted people?
wow i can't believe people the amount of people that defend sickos that enjoy swallowing shit Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
I agree with Mike on this one. And ejc, LD does not stereotype simply because he(maybe) deleted your post about liking DUDES feet, he simply deleted it due to one of the forum rules, No Male Feet allowed...as in you shouldn't discuss how you like male feet and you can't post male feet pics. So he didn't stereotype against you..if that makes sense.
To each his own as I stated before but c'mon... being a shit eater is fucking weird fellas.
Posted by Michael P (Member # 1922) on :
quote:Originally posted by bluetoelover: I agree with Mike on this one. And ejc, LD does not stereotype simply because he(maybe) deleted your post about liking DUDES feet, he simply deleted it due to one of the forum rules, No Male Feet allowed...as in you shouldn't discuss how you like male feet and you can't post male feet pics. So he didn't stereotype against you..if that makes sense.
To each his own as I stated before but c'mon... being a shit eater is fucking weird fellas.
lol i can always count on you to think logically Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
And I find half the time you say the shit I'm thinking but don't want to post Posted by Five For Feet (Member # 33596) on :
quote:Originally posted by Michael P: another thing is what would make anybody think a shit eater would be anything less than a filthy degenerate?
i'm sure some of you have seen jeff the vomit guy on the howard stern show, he is sexually turned on by people that puke on him
does he seem like a normal well adjusted guy to you? you're NOT a bad person if you say no
did the kids you knew that ate paste in elementary school turn out to be normal well adjusted people?
wow i can't believe people the amount of people that defend sickos that enjoy swallowing shit
Yeah, that shit IS weird no doubt. Defending those who do it is not the aim here though, and I could certainly find better ways of "feeling good" about myself as you say. Actually, it sounds like someone might have shit on you when you were a kid or something. Posted by Michael P (Member # 1922) on :
quote:Originally posted by Five For Feet: Yeah, that shit IS weird no doubt. Defending those who do it is not the aim here though, and I could certainly find better ways of "feeling good" about myself as you say. Actually, it sounds like someone might have shit on you when you were a kid or something.
haha nobody shit on me, call me crazy i just think shit is a little disgusting
the funny thing is my pug/beagle mix liked to eat his own poop when he was a puppy
i even got a powder from the vet to put in his food, supposedly this powder would make his shit taste bad
didn't work he still ate his shit
the vet said something like "don't worry, he's just young and dumb he will grow out of it" Posted by Keyfeet (Member # 27313) on :
had to change my first post to represent my current feelings.
Posted by Doc Ock (Member # 46755) on :
People will always judge and stereotype just face it. If you're doing you then don't even sweat it.
Posted by little5 (Member # 26188) on :
As we all know, there are many different kinds of fetishes. Here's a female amputee talking about devotees (those who are attracted to amputees). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n33dQ_qDafU
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Cheers]](graemlins/cheers.gif)
![[Mad]](cuss.gif)
![[Nana]](graemlins/nana.gif)
) preferences.
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)