Uh... I guess it depends.
Posted by Rocky @TheSoleMates (Member # 28971) on :
I can agree on this to an extent. But I have to make sure I like the woman's feet before I can even consider the potential of being romantic with that person.
Posted by AceCorr (Member # 37554) on :
I saw that article as well. Some guys are just too shy to look at the girl in the face. Maybe he wants to check out her feet to see if he wants to be in a relationship in the first place! After all, foot guys don't want a girl with nasty feet.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by Michael Pitt: we are a very small minority
I beg to differ on that one. There's more than you realize.
Posted by philgill11@gmail.com (Member # 51430) on :
Guys don't think like this. If they are foot guys, they need to see if the woman has the type of feet they like before pursuing some kind of romantic relationship. If they have bad feet, time to move on.
Posted by 5thgear (Member # 46148) on :
This article makes no sense. When I look at women's feet it's bc I want to bury my face in them and then glaze them!
Posted by footfunk305 (Member # 50227) on :
I can see this is partially true. There are some women that I just like their feet. I want to suck their toes and thats it. No relationship.
Posted by Kokaith (Member # 22763) on :
And when was the last time that Yahoo ran an article that was decent, not full of one person's opinion, or even relevant...
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
Dumb article in my opinion. So according to the author, I wonder what their perspective is on what guys who look at breasts and asses want.
Posted by dougiezerts (Member # 6829) on :
WHY DO SOME PEOPLE FEEL THEY HAVE TO PSYCHOANAYLIZE US!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by Michael Pitt:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote:Originally posted by Michael Pitt: we are a very small minority
I beg to differ on that one. There's more than you realize.
i'd say 5% of guys at most have a foot fetish
by foot fetish i mean has a desire to touch, suck, or fuck feet or look at pictures and videos of feet
i see no evidence to think it is more than that
Once you build your self confidence more, and start hanging out and socializing in larger circles of friends you will see your 5% is way off.
5%-Are fanatics who visit these forums and are obsessed with feet, demand FJ's, steal shoes to jerk into, you name it and anything else to do with feet.
15%-"Like" feet and wouldn't mind giving their girlfriends foot massages and a kiss on the toes once in awhile. Generally "open" to lite foot touching here and there but could go either way and be satisfied in a relationship if her feet weren't nice.
25%-50%: Aren't "into" feet really, but when a beautiful pair come into view, they will look and admire and think it's just an enhancement of the woman they are attached to. (This is not a fetish guy but an admirer once in awhile and aren't turned "off" by feet).
[ July 24, 2017, 07:10 PM: Message edited by: NorcalfeetStudios ]
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote: 5% have a foot fetish, which you pretty much admitted
The first two tiers are considered a fetish. 5% full blown fetish. 15% foot fetish lite. Very few guys "hate" feet. More just think of them as "feet" and are indifferent. Trust me, the club isn't as exclusive as you think it is. Take this site for instance, there are probably 5 times or more lurkers than posters and 10 times that who don't have an account and just browse here once in awhile. It's not all bad news.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by Michael Pitt: it means they want sex and not friendship
this article just proves what i always felt, there is no biological reason to like feet
sizing up her body means you are evaluating her for sex, which leads to reproduction
most guys couldn't care less about feet so if they are looking at them it means they aren't interested, because they are "just feet" and not sexual
article makes sense to me
this is why being attracted to feet is considered a fetish, it might be the most common fetish but a fetish is never considered normal or common
Makes sense in that respect. I would think that if a guy is looking at a girl's feet in the first place, it's because he's likely into feet and is indeed sizing her up as a viable partner for carnal activities; much in the same way a guy would size up a girl by checking out her breasts or ass. In the example of a foot guy, feet are very much a part of his sex life, so he's evaluating hers.
If the guy is looking at her feet and isn't into feet, then I could see how that'd indicate that he potentially isn't sexually interested in her. Or maybe he is, but is too intimidated by her to make eye contact.
And I agree with you that a full blown foot fetish isn't that common. However, I do think it's the most common fetish of anything that would be considered out of the norm (breasts, ass, genitalia) and that may be why it leads people to think it's more common in general than what it actually is. I also think socializing with like minded people daily, such as on this site, distorts one perception on how common something actually is. Essentially creating a sort of bubble effect.
Guys who simply massage or kiss their girlfriend's or wife's feet, I would agree aren't genuinely into feet and wouldn't be considered as having a foot fetish.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote: i don't consider your 2nd tiers to be a fetish, there has to be a sexual arousal for it to be a fetish
That's your opinion, but the original question or debate was you thought 95% of guys hated or simply didn't like feet at all which is incorrect.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote: i don't consider your 2nd tiers to be a fetish, there has to be a sexual arousal for it to be a fetish
That's your opinion, but the original question or debate was you thought 95% of guys hated or simply didn't like feet at all which is incorrect.
If you're referring to him saying that there has to be sexual arousal for it to be a fetish is an opinion, it's actually a fact. The psychological definition of the word states it results in exactly that.
quote: i don't consider your 2nd tiers to be a fetish, there has to be a sexual arousal for it to be a fetish
That's your opinion, but the original question or debate was you thought 95% of guys hated or simply didn't like feet at all which is incorrect.
If you're referring to him saying that there has to be sexual arousal for it to be a fetish is an opinion, it's actually a fact. The psychological definition of the word states it results in exactly that.
No, that was just something you concocted to move the argument (as usual) in a direction other than the main topic and the stated comment he posed, being the other 95% of men in the world hating feet or not liking feet being a wholly fallacious and purely speculative opinion. You don't have to have a "fetish" to "like" feet or admire their beauty. Obviously not everyone gets off on feet.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
Um, no? It's the definition of the word.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
Read above post again.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
Yes, and those people don't have a fetish. So why are you tying to lump them in with fetishists to support your claim that foot fetish is common?
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote: You don't have to have a "fetish" to "like" feet or admire their beauty. Obviously not everyone gets off on feet.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
Correct. So those people don't apply to the argument that a foot fetish is common because they don't have one if they're not sexually aroused by feet, as the definition of a fetish clearly states.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84: Correct. So those people don't apply to the argument that a foot fetish is common, because they don't have one.
No they do in this instance because his claim was essentially 95% hate feet or didn't like them which wasn't true based on either fetish or lite admiration of feet.. Again, you're steering this into unnecessary waters. Let it go.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
Why are you attempting to argue the definition of a word and make up your own interpretation of it?
We're talking about a "foot fetish" being common or not.
We're talking about people WHO HATE FEET and how it's not 95% of the population. How hard is that to understand?
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote: i don't consider your 2nd tiers to be a fetish, there has to be a sexual arousal for it to be a fetish
That's your opinion
Based on the psychological definition of the word, what MP stated wasn't an opinion; it's a fact. That's all I was pointing out.
Your 2nd tiers wouldn't be considered a foot fetish, ergo, non applicable in an argument that claims a foot fetish, not merely looking at feet here and there and not being repulsed by them, is common.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote: i don't consider your 2nd tiers to be a fetish, there has to be a sexual arousal for it to be a fetish
That's your opinion
Based on the psychological definition of the word, what MP stated wasn't an opinion; it's a fact. That's all I was pointing out.
Your 2nd tiers wouldn't be considered foot fetish, ergo, non applicable in an argument that claims a "foot fetish", not merely looking at feet here and there and not being repulsed by them, is common.
It's his opinion that's it's not, just as it's mine that there are in fact 2 tiers of "Foot Admiration". In fact, there's at least 50 shades of grey when it comes to feet..I guess being in the know sometimes it's hard for me to explain that to anonymous commentors online.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote: i don't consider your 2nd tiers to be a fetish, there has to be a sexual arousal for it to be a fetish
That's your opinion
Based on the psychological definition of the word, what MP stated wasn't an opinion; it's a fact. That's all I was pointing out.
Your 2nd tiers wouldn't be considered foot fetish, ergo, non applicable in an argument that claims a "foot fetish", not merely looking at feet here and there and not being repulsed by them, is common.
It's his opinion that's it's not, just as it's mine that there are in fact 2 tiers of "Foot Admiration". In fact, there's at least 50 shades of grey when it comes to feet..I guess being in the know sometimes it's hard for me to explain that to anonymous commentors online.
I suppose you can't reason with someone who won't let facts get in the way of a good story.
You don't need to be "in the know" of anything to read a dictionary.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
95% don't hate feet. I don't care about the online laboratory definition of "fetish" means. It means different things to different people when it comes to feet. When you deal with as many customers and requests for photos and videos as I do on a daily basis you see this. But I wouldn't expect you to understand.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: 95% don't hate feet. I don't care about the online laboratory definition of "fetish" means. It means different things to different people when it comes to feet. When you deal with as many customers and requests for photos and videos as I do on a daily basis you see this. But I wouldn't expect you to understand.
Translation: I won't let facts get in the way of a "good" post on a foot fetish forum.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: 95% don't hate feet. I don't care about the online laboratory definition of "fetish" means. It means different things to different people when it comes to feet. When you deal with as many customers and requests for photos and videos as I do on a daily basis you see this. But I wouldn't expect you to understand.
Translation: I won't let facts get in the way of a "good" post on a foot fetish forum.
Reflecting much? Answer the 95% hating feet, that's the core of the discussion. You are essentially assuming only 5 million adult males in the USA have full blown foot fetish? ha.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: Reflecting much? Answer the 95% hating feet, that's the core of the discussion. You are essentially assuming only 5 million adult males in the USA have full blown foot fetish? ha.
^
Thinks the suffix word "fetish" in the term "foot fetish" can mean whatever one wants it to mean when it comes to exclusively feet, and doesn't actually mean what the definition of the word "fetish" is.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
Better yet, let me say it like this. You and Michael Pitt believe 3.2 Billion of the total 3.4 Billion men on Earth hate feet. That's what his claim is in round numbers. That's mathematically impossible.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: Better yet, let me say it like this. You and Michael Pitt believe 3.2 Billion of the total 3.4 Billion men on Earth hate feet. That's what his claim is in round numbers. That's mathematically impossible.
I never once in this thread stated 3.2 of 3.4 billion men on Earth hate feet.
However, what I did state was that you claiming that MP stating that there needs to be sexual arousal for something to be considered a fetish is an opinion, is actually a fact. Nothing more.
Like I said, don't let little things like facts get in the way of a good story though.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
I didn't define it, the dictionary did. E-mail Miriam Webster if you disagree with it, not sure what to tell you; you're wasting your time arguing with me that the definition of the word doesn't mean what you think it means.
All you're doing is not letting things like facts get in the way of what you think will make for a good debate.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
^
Accuses people of derailing a thread once things like facts get in the way of his story.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by 5thgear: This article makes no sense. When I look at women's feet it's bc I want to bury my face in them and then glaze them!
Now that's something we can all agree on, hopefully. Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote: Any further points rehashing this on your part proves the meme and my statement. Your choice.
Claims others can't let something go, but has to make sure he gets the last post and even include a meme.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
^
Claims others can't let something go, but is still making sure he gets the final post.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:And when was the last time that Yahoo ran an article that was decent, not full of one person's opinion, or even relevant...
I don't recall ever. But I'll tell you, opinion sure triggers people with predisposed personality issues online in the form of reflecting oneself onto another and accusing them of the very thing they themselves are doing. We see this mostly regarding the current president and the media feud, it's horribly exhausting when you just want to see regular news.
In other news: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_fetishism I guess by definition then my tier 1 & 2 both have a foot fetish or at least "partialism" as defined by Wikipedia. So the number is now up to around 20-25% have some type or varying degree of a foot fetish.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: I don't recall ever. But I'll tell you, opinion sure triggers people with predisposed personality issues online in the form of reflecting oneself onto another and accusing them of the very thing they themselves are doing. We see this mostly regarding the current president and the media feud, it's horribly exhausting when you just want to see regular news.
In other news: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_fetishism I guess by definition then my tier 1 & 2 both have a foot fetish or at least "partialism" as defined by Wikipedia. So the number is now up to around 20-25% have some type or varying degree of a foot fetish.
^
Now he's a doctor and bringing politics into a discussion that has utterly nothing to do with politics.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
25% of adult men or better have a foot fetish to a varying degree. Lots of grey areas on the definition depending on the desire. I've been studying the algorithms, data and random sampling of opinion for over 11 years on this subject through website requests, in person social interactions at foot parties through the years, random sampling with "non-foot" people circles of friends.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_fetishism Foot partialism is also listed as a sub group of the actual fetish definition side. Partial to something like feet could be both a fetish or non-sexual. I know many men in everyday life who think feet are "sexy" or "nice" but aren't "sexually" attracted to them but it's a trigger point to actual sex. That's provable science. Again, not black and white.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: 25% of adult men or better have a foot fetish to a varying degree. Lots of grey areas on the definition depending on the desire. I've been studying the algorithms for over 11 years on this subject through website requests, in person social interactions at foot parties through the years, random sampling with "non-foot" people circles of friends.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_fetishism Foot partialism is also listed as a sub group of the actual fetish definition side. Partial to something like feet could be both a fetish or non-sexual. That's provable science. Again, not black and white.
^
Now he's a doctor and a statistician.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Now he's a doctor and a statistician.
You don't know anything about me other than the fact I run a very successful foot fetish website. Your lofty claims and constant need to argue over spilled milk don't look very good for you. You know you've won an argument when the other person makes the first personal dig because they've run out of options. 25% have a foot fetish, scroll on past if that information bothers you.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
A survey done by Cosmo a few years ago and one done by Playboy a few years earlier than that found that about 20-25% of men (women reporting about their lovers in the Cosmo study) had an interest in female feet, to the point of foot kissing and toe sucking.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: You don't know anything about me other than the fact I run a very successful foot fetish website. Your lofty claims and constant need to argue over spilled milk don't look very good for you. You know you've won an argument when the other person makes the first personal dig because they've run out of options. 25% have a foot fetish, scroll on past if that information bothers you.
^
Finds a way to bring up and laud himself and his website in a discussion that has nothing to do with either, and claims others are "arguing over spilled milk", as he argues over "spilled milk" while arbitrarily making up percentages.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote: You know you've won an argument when the other person makes the first personal dig because they've run out of options.
You forgot to mention this and how it applies to your comments here. Then again, I think folks can see who is being hostile here. I am simply stating what I know to be True based on MY research about Foot Fetish people, somehow that threatens your coexistence here. Not sure how that works.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
And please resize your avatar would you? I think Wu himself showed us how to do this back in 2008.
Holy shit forget about feet, how about you two just bang and get it over with...
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by Kokaith: Holy shit forget about feet, how about you two just bang and get it over with...
He does have an unhealthy obsession with me doesn't he? I could totally have one of my gals lay him and he'd mellow out a bit. Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote: You know you've won an argument when the other person makes the first personal dig because they've run out of options.
You forgot to mention this and how it applies to your comments here.
...yet follows that up with:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: He does have an unhealthy obsession with me doesn't he? I could totally have one of my gals lay him and he'd mellow out a bit.
^ While still again bringing up his site in a discussion that has nothing to do with it.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
Definitely Unhealthy. It's funny how just stating an opinion can twist someone up so bad they spend all this time to be here. So what if someone's potentially wrong about something (facts or figures) scrolling past is much easier. How does telling them in 3 pages of text that they're wrong going to change their thoughts on anything? It has the opposite affect in fact.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote: You know you've won an argument when the other person makes the first personal dig because they've run out of options.
You forgot to mention this and how it applies to your comments here. Then again, I think folks can see who is being hostile here.
....yet again, follows that up with:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: Definitely Unhealthy. It's funny how just stating an opinion can twist someone up so bad they spend all this time to be here. So what if someone's potentially wrong about something (facts or figures) scrolling past is much easier. How does telling them in 3 pages of text that they're wrong going to change their thoughts on anything? It has the opposite affect in fact.
Translation: So what if I'm wrong? Don't point out to me that I am.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Translation: So what if I'm wrong? Don't point out to me that I am.
No the problem and burden lies with you for having the grandiose need to authoritatively bicker and attack someone who is expressing their findings and stats based on personal research about foot fetish percentages. Don't like it? Move on.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: No the problem and burden lies with you for having the grandiose need to authoritatively bicker and attack someone who is expressing their findings and stats based on personal research about foot fetish percentages. Don't like it? Move on.
Translation: Don't politely point out to me the definition of a word actually states that it means something other than what I personally think it means to fit my story.
...yet:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: He does have an unhealthy obsession with me doesn't he? I could totally have one of my gals lay him and he'd mellow out a bit.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
End of the day, it's an opinion based on personal research. Who cares? We get it, you've never liked my website or what I've had to say. Get over it already and let me "be wrong".
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: End of the day, it's an opinion based on personal research, and you can't deal with it so you rage to get a point across for 3 pages using strawman arguments. We get it, you've never liked my website or what I've had to say. Get over it already and let me "be wrong".
^ Tells other people that they're "raging" as he rages himself, while still managing to for some peculiar reason bring up his website and himself in a discussion that had nothing to do with either.
But he's not raging:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: He does have an unhealthy obsession with me doesn't he? I could totally have one of my gals lay him and he'd mellow out a bit.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
So,let me be "wrong" then and scroll past without commenting on it. Is it that hard?
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: twist someone up so bad they spend all this time to be here.
...yet deletes his previous post of "So let me be wrong then and scroll past," and rewrites it nearly an hour later after pondering something different to say to:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: So,let me be "wrong" then and scroll past without commenting on it. Is it that hard?
Translation: If you're going to politely point out something incorrect in my opinion for discussion purposes, then don't post in the discussion thread.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
yet he comes back and checks the little details of the last post.My opinion, let me be wrong. Scroll past and get over it.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: You know you've won an argument when the other person makes the first personal dig because they've run out of options.
...yet continues to demonstrate he's not above doing what he claims he's against:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: My opinion, let me be wrong. Scroll past and get over your insecurities.
^ Despite him for some odd reason making the discussion personal by repeatedly bringing up his site and himself and feeling the urge to sing his own praises, when the discussion had never been about either.
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: yet he comes back and checks the little details of the last post.My opinion, let me be wrong. Scroll past and get over it.
^ Tells others to "get over it", as he continues posting to tell others to "get over it".
[ July 25, 2017, 08:06 PM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
No matter how much you post and complain about it you'll never change my mind or my opinion so you're just wasting your time and I'm glad to live rent-free as we used to say many years ago on the mousepad if you remember correctly.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: No matter how much you post and complain about it you'll never change my mind or my opinion so you're just wasting your time and I'm glad to live rent-free as we used to say many years ago on the mousepad if you remember correctly.
^ Tells others they're living "rent free", as he continues posting.
And I'm not complaining about anything. All I did was provide what the definition of the word "fetish" is, since you said it means something different when applied exclusively to feet. If you don't want that fact to get in the way of what you feel is a good story, then feel free not to. You don't have to let it change your opinion if you don't want.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
Still my opinion and still angry about it, just scroll past.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: Still my opinion and still angry about it, just scroll past.
I'm not angry about providing the definition of a word. And yes, feel free to have your opinion; nobody ever told you that you can't.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
It's still my opinion scroll past without commenting if you can.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: It's still my opinion scroll past without commenting if you can.
Translation: If you disagree with me, then don't post.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
No you just hate my opinion specifically because you've had a vendetta against me for about 3 years now.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: No you just hate my opinion specifically because you've had a vendetta against me for about 3 years now.
^ Continues to for whatever bizarre reason, make a discussion that never was about him, about him.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
Let's see how fast they will shut this throw down now. I think it's definitely run its course.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: It's about me now. And how are you have a vendetta. Don't act like you don't remember that conversation three years ago. Let's see how fast we can shut this thread down now.
What an utterly bizarre comment. The discussion isn't and never was about you, so if you want to make it about you and talk about yourself for whatever odd reason, then you're on your own there.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
Let's take bets on when they will shut it down. Anyone..do I hear $20?
Posted by BTL2.0 (Member # 49128) on :
NorCal and BareSoles are gonna have to Indian Leg Wrestle to see who comes out on top.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
Let's take bets on when they will shut it down. Anyone..do I hear $20?
Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
OK guys, this has gotten way out of hand. Topic closed.
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)