posted
It isn't anyone else's business if someone happens to see me thumb through a copy of Cosmo. No shame in my game.
People will have their own ideas as to why I may be looking at that particular magazine. I can't control their thoughts or read their minds, so the only opinion I have to concern myself with is my own.
posted
Hell, this just happened to me the other day. I was at the mall in a bookstore and saw a Magazine with Gwyneth Paltrow, obviously barfoot on the cover. (I forget the name of the Mag). I immediately went and picked it up only to be disappointed that only half of each of her bare feet fit on the cover photo. I looked in the magazine to see if maybe there were other foot shots. Heck I have bought mags just for barefoot shots. One was a country music magazine that had a great spread of Leanne Rhimes in it barefoot as the day she was born, another was a Hilary Duff magazine. Who cares what people think?
quote:Originally posted by nylonfootsniffer: I was at the mall in a bookstore and saw a Magazine with Gwyneth Paltrow, obviously barfoot on the cover. (I forget the name of the Mag).
You may be talking about the Jan 2006 British edition of Glamour. I'm not even into Gwyneth at all, but I made it my business to stop and check it out when I saw that magazine staring at me from one of the racks of a Times Square newsstand the other evening. Here's an alternate version of that cover shot for ya where her feet aren't cut out of view or obscured:
posted
Damn right I am going to look at it... if folks look, no big deal.
-------------------- V/R, FM9 aka Mr. Footbooty "She had real pretty feet. I was always a sucker for pretty little feet... Outside of her being pretty and hip, with a good body, her feet is what attracted me." - p. 39 of "Miles" (Davis) The Autobiography Posts: 8821 | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by nylonfootsniffer: I was at the mall in a bookstore and saw a Magazine with Gwyneth Paltrow, obviously barfoot on the cover. (I forget the name of the Mag).
You may be talking about the Jan 2006 British edition of Glamour. I'm not even into Gwyneth at all, but I made it my business to stop and check it out when I saw that magazine staring at me from one of the racks of a Times Square newsstand the other evening. Here's an alternate version of that cover shot for ya where her feet aren't cut out of view or obscured:
Yep, thats it! Thanks CJ. I always liked Gwyneth Paltrow. Her feet are just average, but I find her as a whole to be very sexy
Posts: 371 | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I do that all the time. My wife loves the magazines I bring home and sometimes points out the cute feet that are in them. Cosmo, InStyle.. all of those type magazines, not to mention FHM and Stuff.
Posts: 95 | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |