posted
Gotcha, I put those kinds of shots into my sets. I'll be honest though, I don't usually preview those shots because of my sole focus. Those toes and arch shots can be found in the members galleries. Here are several that I just threw into a folder so you can see.
posted
Those were not done by the girls. Although I've said that I want to learn how to paint nail designs, I have yet to look into it. I went to art school and have held a paint brush or two, but I know it will take some getting used to.
posted
There's more to feet than soles--although that's an important part of the foot! Actually, I really like frontal shots of barefoot girls just standing. Very sensual.
-------------------- "You have very nice feet!" Posts: 3711 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Soles are more exciting because they're much less visible. Nice toenails are beautiful, but bare soles are like seeing the feet naked.
I always try to photo the tops as long as they're descent, but fleshy bare soles straight out of shoes are the priority. With random strangers, sometimes they get up and walk away before I get every angle.
What I don't understand is how so many other web-site's sets start with the girl already barefoot. Like where did that come from? I want to know how it happened. What kind of shoes, sandals, socks, footwear, etc, led up to it.
It's a big mistake for webmasters to cater to every random request. It's impossible to please everyone, and attempting to do so makes a web-site more generic and less appealing to everyone in general.
Webmasters must have a their own independent drive and unique individual appeal.
quote:Originally posted by goodguyneighbor: Soles are more exciting because they're much less visible. Nice toenails are beautiful, but bare soles are like seeing the feet naked.
this is a great perspective that summarizes the internal attraction which i have had for soles but did not know how to communicate it exactly.
the point is very true and when women wear sandals in public we automatically see their toes from plain view. the ability to see her soles is harder because she is standing on them and usually at best, we might catch a partial glimpse as she is flexing her arch and walking off.
i almost view the perspective of seeing a woman's soles as the foot fetish equivalent of a breast flashing tease to titty men, except soles are like that to foot men. the fact that we don't get to see them outright as a standard view in the normal everyday public makes the sole view a special treat for men who like feet.
i am a guy who likes to have a little bit of tease to go along with my foot show from a woman. if she can offer that view of her soles for me, i feel very VERY turned on and i even feel a little more special than if she only showed me her same toes that she already shows to every tom dick and harry who passes by.
in my personal train of thought, I feel extra appreciative of a woman when she specifically lifts her foot up in such a way to reveal her soles. it is extra special.
in fact, there are some countries in this world where the bottom of womens' soles are almost never seen at all simply because the rules and customs of the country consider it a grave insult to let the bottom of one's foot to be visible to another person.
depravity on this scale is horrendous, but it is the depravity on the everyday scale in normal countries that i believe makes sole fans the majority. people tend to gravitate more toward things that they can't just automatically have in a normal day-to-day routine.
female sole views are generally less prominent in everyday life compared to the same availability of their toe cleavage. anyone who has stood in line at a bank or a grocery store with hot women in sandals will know what i am talking about.
[ August 31, 2009, 04:18 AM: Message edited by: Tyler D. ]
posted
yeah i love the toes too. they are my favorite, but i like to see the whole thing, soles and toes.
-------------------- "Nina, this is my house, you work for me, and I want to suck your toes." -Big Trouble (2002) Posts: 1855 | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote: It's a big mistake for webmasters to cater to every random request.
This may not work for every webmaster/website but some of the longest running foot-related websites & clip stores are the ones that cater for a very wide variety of sub-fetishes....so it certainly works for some sites (like "Chloe`s Creations" or "Charlee`s Adventures" or Toejac`s sites). Plus, I often think it is a real shame to visit a website with beautiful models that only specializes on one niche (e.g. nylons or high-heels) and knowing that I won`t be able to see those girls barefooted....because the webmaster doesn`t take any requests.
Of course there are those corporate sites that have 10 different foot fetish sites with all the same models and locations, but have... 1 site for bare foot, 1 site for tickling, 1 site for stockings, 1 site for sweaty/smelly feet, 1 site for ball busting, 1 site for foot jobs, 1 site for female/female foot worship, etc. I found that to be annoying, but they seem to keep going, so someone is buying memberships.
I still say the moral of the whole discussion is try to offer some variety, but ultimately it is each web master's site and they have to do what they think is best for themselves and their members. If people don't like it, they'll leave. If they do like it, they'll stay.
posted
I am in agreement with Hal. As much as I love soles (and that is probably what trips my trigger the most), I want to see what the tops look like. I love the whole foot and want to see all the angles.
Hal made the case with a few photographic examples that were enchanting; I loved Patrick's response - quite delightful.
Though I do enjoy soles, I can never tell what will capture me, a beautiful curve to the arch, the breadth and depth of an elegantly painted nail (or a natural look), or the definition of the knuckles; even the sweep & flow and smooth flesh from the instep to the toe.
Man! I love women's feet!!
Posts: 5067 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |