posted
alright,look there was no negativity intended by the clip or the clip description.the description is intended to reach those that may love to see women that are not usually known to be promiscuous doing the things we all would love to see and more commonly expect from someone outside of non religious country.i did not know that there were even people that love adult entertainment,but somehow did not enjoy taboo fantasy as the topic or description of what the video would contain. almost anyone that attempts to get people to notice a video among millions of other videos in a common genre,will try to use the description as a chance to add a little shock value. and in my own experience as someone that makes adult videos,i have noticed plenty of times,when i do not mention where a model is from people will contact me to ask. there millions upon millions of adult video content out there,but one thing is for sure the most known types ethnically seem to be white,black,asian,spanish and brazilian.not saying nobody else from other backgrounds are ever shown,but be honest to fact that there are so many people from all walks of life,yet the ethnic groups i mentioned just now are the ones you see in adult video the most. the description of that particular youtube video,was just to give people a alternative fantasy and in some cases one that many people may have actually had or may have just fond a new attraction for because of what was shown.now dick mentioned he is not religous or jewish despite he choose the name"Lipschitz " as his username in the forum,i will not go on to switch the topic to you having a personal issue with the word jewish being mentioned or even about the woman being jewish,but i have to point out how dick mentions"I'm not a religious nut -- hell, I'm not even Jewish -- but the description in the original post seems more than a little anti-Semitic, as if to say, "Check out what the black guy does to the Jew chick." than he later says that he found the use of the description as "I don't know what was in his mind when he composed his description, but it's laden with certain connotations, intentional or otherwise. I'm not easily offended, but this one offends, and I know I'm not alone, judging by the IMs I've gotten to my earlier note." now once again there was never any intent to be offensive,as instead it was all about the beauty of a certain type of female we sometimes over look for all the reasons described.now when just about every foot site or any adult site for that matter,that is operated by and features mostly white people engaged in in adult acts on video has a black woman or black man on their site doing what we all love to see...i never take offense to it,not especially i they are not saying negative stuff.most will mention the color or ethnic background when a black person is involved,but not mention a person is white to often.i know that 90% of the time there is no derogatory message hidden in there.they are just trying to grab attention and point out something that is not done all the time on their website or clip stores.the idea is to throw in a little taboo,to show you that it's different from anything else they maybe known for. i can kind of see someone being upset by it;but truly not about a description that was nothing but absolute praise.if you noticed the 1st person to make an issue of the idea of the youtube clip,decided to come from a different. an angle.an angle that was directed at the fact that this woman is married and should not be doing something like that without her husband' consent. he actually chose to use a topic from another thread to show his dislike for the video. hmmmmm.meanwhile,this topic here is not the first to mention a woman slipping out on her husband for some foot fetish ONLY action.but for some reason he felt compelled to bring it u in this thread. seems to me that even though,this was supposed to be looked at in a positive non derogatory light,it somehow struck a chord in a few people unintentionally. again the video is supposed to wake people up to something they may have over looked. but not to offend anyone directly.now her husband...yeah i can see him being pissed if anyone.but for everyone else,this was supposed to be fun and enjoying and also draw attention to a phenomenal woman with phenomenal character and insanely attractive feet at an age where most women are not looked at as attractive as much as they have once been.maybe we could have gotten people to add some more mature feet from some more women,nobody ever seems to mention in their fantasy.and yes it maybe said to say,but seeing some indian chick in a video giving a footjob to someone other than an indian turns me on,but not more than if the description mentioned that,she is "hindu" or "hindi".i love taboo porn,so long as it is 2 consenting adults.thanks everyone for paticipating in this thread. SOLESQUIRTERS video clipsWatch & share femdom & foot fetish videos.Posts: 175 | Registered: Mar 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'd have to agree and say that it was inappropriate to mention the word "Jewish". Mature aged, Israeli feet would have sufficed !!
Posts: 461 | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
man as far as the whole jewish thing goes, GET OVER YOURSELVES, how many times does it say, "latina" feet or "black" feet or whatever, it is simply a classification, Israeli does not work because not all Israelis are automatically Jewish, get over yourselves you are no better than anybody else, who cares if you got classified by your religion, Jewish people have been dealing with that since the beginning of time, you are only reinforcing stereotypes of Jewish people being overly sensitive and always complaining
Posts: 7 | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
umm hes not saying it to be a raciest. it the same if someone sed "black feet" or "shanish feet", no harm intended, just telling u they ethnessie.
Posts: 456 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote: man as far as the whole jewish thing goes, GET OVER YOURSELVES, how many times does it say, "latina" feet or "black" feet or whatever, it is simply a classification, Israeli does not work because not all Israelis are automatically Jewish, get over yourselves you are no better than anybody else, who cares if you got classified by your religion, Jewish people have been dealing with that since the beginning of time, you are only reinforcing stereotypes of Jewish people being overly sensitive and always complaining
Maybe its because the Jewish people have been hunted and slaughtered for decades is the reason why they are 'sensitive'. Even today they are a hated people, always accused of being power and money hungry. There is always an under current of hate and mistrust against the Jews.
You my friend are only reinforcing sterotypes of gentiles who are full of jealously, intolerance and hatred.
Posts: 461 | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged |
quote: man as far as the whole jewish thing goes, GET OVER YOURSELVES, how many times does it say, "latina" feet or "black" feet or whatever, it is simply a classification, Israeli does not work because not all Israelis are automatically Jewish, get over yourselves you are no better than anybody else, who cares if you got classified by your religion, Jewish people have been dealing with that since the beginning of time, you are only reinforcing stereotypes of Jewish people being overly sensitive and always complaining
Maybe its because the Jewish people have been hunted and slaughtered for decades is the reason why they are 'sensitive'. Even today they are a hated people, always accused of being power and money hungry. There is always an under current of hate and mistrust against the Jews.
You my friend are only reinforcing sterotypes of gentiles who are full of jealously, intolerance and hatred.
And you think African-Americans have not? 400+ years of enslavement around the world, lynching, Jim Crow (30 years after the Holocaust), etc. But yet, when someone posts "Nice Black Feet" or something of that magnitude, I don't trip. Sure the poster could have just said, "Nice feet", but I don't go off and think the guy/gal is a racist bigot. I click on the link and I'm like, damn the poster was right, those are some nice black feet.
Posts: 190 | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote: man as far as the whole jewish thing goes, GET OVER YOURSELVES, how many times does it say, "latina" feet or "black" feet or whatever, it is simply a classification, Israeli does not work because not all Israelis are automatically Jewish, get over yourselves you are no better than anybody else, who cares if you got classified by your religion, Jewish people have been dealing with that since the beginning of time, you are only reinforcing stereotypes of Jewish people being overly sensitive and always complaining
Maybe its because the Jewish people have been hunted and slaughtered for decades is the reason why they are 'sensitive'. Even today they are a hated people, always accused of being power and money hungry. There is always an under current of hate and mistrust against the Jews.
You my friend are only reinforcing sterotypes of gentiles who are full of jealously, intolerance and hatred.
And you think African-Americans have not? 400+ years of enslavement around the world, lynching, Jim Crow (30 years after the Holocaust), etc. But yet, when someone posts "Nice Black Feet" or something of that magnitude, I don't trip. Sure the poster could have just said, "Nice feet", but I don't go off and think the guy/gal is a racist bigot. I click on the link and I'm like, damn the poster was right, those are some nice black feet.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
