posted
Like everything else it just comes down to preference. I wouldn't say they "destroy" the foot's beauty but I definitely rather worship feet that don't have a tat on them. There are some women with feet so beautiful that you can't deny them either way though.
Posts: 1251 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thanks for all your votes, and your thoughts. On reflection, I think I should have worded the responses differently--less harshly. I'm sorry about that.
-------------------- "You have very nice feet!" Posts: 3712 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Goddess Elizabeth: I, like Mona, will stand by my original thought/comment. I did not say I was offended, in fact I had stated that I didn't wish to offend anyone reading my comment but I think a little honesty around here is overdue. Especially by the ladies who do take the time to post photographs. All I wanted to do was to invoke thought in the possible few who would open their minds to the actual point I attempted to make. The poll says one thing but the Pictures Section sings a different tune. Imagine how many other FREE pictures are missed out on because you all just HAD to share how "destructive" foot tattoos are to the over all "natural" beauty of a woman's foot. Just saying....
I would not take it to heart. They are all preferences. But in real life, I highly doubt anyone would turn down a foot session with a beautiful babe and be like "aww, you have a tattoo on your foot, i'm not interested." Boards and real life are two very different things imho.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
Just saying.... 
