posted
Have any of you that were opposed to girls with foot tattoos changed your mind on them that they have become more trendy than ever? I was never totally turned off by them but used to be at a point where I felt like they added something to the foot. Now I almost feel like I want my girl to have a foot tattoo of some sort. How do all you others feel?
-------------------- If feet are your bottom line, you're gonna get trampled...if women are your bottom line, you're gonna get lovestruck!
posted
I've always loved them, because foot tattoos readily signal that they're at least 18 and probably open minded. Makes my job easier+ they're cute.
quote:Originally posted by goodguyneighbor: I've always loved them, because foot tattoos readily signal that they're at least 18 and probably open minded. Makes my job easier+ they're cute.
posted
I depends if it's in good taste. A tattoo of a unicorn or dolphin is pretty cheesy. Where the tattoo is placed can also add to the aesthetic appeal.
-------------------- If she won't indulge your fetish, I bet you that cuter, smarter girl across the bar will. Lets go find out. Posts: 1877 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm 50/50 on tattoos in general. Really, it depends on the girl too. On some girls I really like them, on others, not at all.
And good guy, I think I know of at least 5 girls I've worked with in the last couple years whose parents let them get tattoos before they turned 18. Wonder if it's a generational thing of them thinking it's okay. My senior prom date (Madison) back in 1997 had a tattoo on her leg and she was actually in the class of 1999. Have you ever found that the girl wasn't of age using that method?
In response to the original question, no, my opinion has not changed. If anything, the fact that they're so trendy has made me more resolute. The way I see it, tattoos are a sure sign of mediocrity, a screaming beacon to the world that declares: "Look how individual I am! I got body ink! Just like everyone else!"
Why anyone feels the need to "enhance" something that comes out of the box in perfectly lovely condition ... well, it's beyond me. Most psychologists will tell you it's indicative of self-esteem issues, but that's getting into an area above my paygrade.
Your mileage may vary. (And probably will.) If you enjoy them, great. I'd like to think I'm not alone, though.
posted
ah i'm not terribly into the foot tatoo thing either, doubt i ever will be. i think of it as a permanent dressing up of sorts, which to me gets boring. can't "clean" it off when your done. i really could go on about it, but i won't. i'm pretty certain my opinion has been made clear. with that; to each his own.
Posts: 3 | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Some look nice and some do not look nice. But in general I like em.
-------------------- New Ship but she's got the right name. You treat her like a lady and she'll always bring you home. Posts: 4051 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think some look sexy as fuck, and others verge on the ridiculous, it all depends on the design chosen (and the capability of the tattooist!)
Posts: 37 | Registered: Jul 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dick Lipschitz: Tattoos? Ick.
In response to the original question, no, my opinion has not changed. If anything, the fact that they're so trendy has made me more resolute. The way I see it, tattoos are a sure sign of mediocrity, a screaming beacon to the world that declares: "Look how individual I am! I got body ink! Just like everyone else!"
Why anyone feels the need to "enhance" something that comes out of the box in perfectly lovely condition ... well, it's beyond me. Most psychologists will tell you it's indicative of self-esteem issues, but that's getting into an area above my paygrade.
Your mileage may vary. (And probably will.) If you enjoy them, great. I'd like to think I'm not alone, though.
quote:Originally posted by Dick Lipschitz: Tattoos? Ick.
In response to the original question, no, my opinion has not changed. If anything, the fact that they're so trendy has made me more resolute. The way I see it, tattoos are a sure sign of mediocrity, a screaming beacon to the world that declares: "Look how individual I am! I got body ink! Just like everyone else!"
Why anyone feels the need to "enhance" something that comes out of the box in perfectly lovely condition ... well, it's beyond me. Most psychologists will tell you it's indicative of self-esteem issues, but that's getting into an area above my paygrade.
Your mileage may vary. (And probably will.) If you enjoy them, great. I'd like to think I'm not alone, though.
Cheers, DL
Yes, overall Id say "Never try to improve upon nature... 1)Most of the time I think they look cheesey.. 2) I had a girlfriend who had an inconspicuous one maybe 1 inch on the outside of her calf. Thought it was very so-so. 3)I agree with Lipschitz-Overall foot guys may be more cerebral and mediocrity is just not cool.. (I mean geez--you think Hillary Clinton has a damn foot tatoo?) 4)They are not unique.
posted
I think as long as the tattoo doesn't take up the whole foot it's okay. Anything large just doesn't do it for me.
Posts: 1278 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
