quote:Originally posted by Tyler D.: were the chics into it? and if so, would they have possibly been interested in attending foot parties where no money is exchanged?
Ya right. The only reason they're there is to get money. They may enjoy it a bit, but they won't do it for free when they could get paid for it.
Posts: 139 | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Uhhh...who DOES work for free when they get paid for it?
I love my job, but I'm not going to do it for free. Who does? I mean, really?
Thinking people "owe" you something is one sure-fire way NOT to get it. That's just life, and you are the same way with your work. If you hate your job, that's irrelevant because if you liked it you would not say "Oh, you don't have to PAY me. I'll do it for free!"
Time to get real, guys.
Posts: 16 | Registered: Sep 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Sole Fanatic: That's just life, and you are the same way with your work. If you hate your job, that's irrelevant because if you liked it you would not say "Oh, you don't have to PAY me. I'll do it for free!"
There's a difference between jobs and pasttimes. If somebody is doing something as a job then they should get paid.
But if somebody is just out having fun doing something they like to do, then why should they artificially create the pressure of payment?
Generally speaking, the requirement for payment is a process that formalizes the service and subsequently makes the interaction more cold.
You wouldn't go out for a night on the town with some female friends and then say to them that they should require people to pay them before they start having fun on the dance floor would you?
There is a difference between working and playing. The point myself and others have been trying to make is that women who prefer to play are better than those who work to collect the pay.
Over the years, some fetishists have grown so accustomed to having to pay women for feet that they forget it is entirely possible to woo a woman with one's personality instead of the wallet. I personally believe that getting feet w/o the wallet is the best path to quality foot lovin.
Trust me on this, I speak from experience. When a woman truly likes you for who you are, she will go that extra mile with her feet to make sure you are taken care of if ya catch my drift fellas
quote:Originally posted by Tyler D.: were the chics into it? and if so, would they have possibly been interested in attending foot parties where no money is exchanged?
Ya right. The only reason they're there is to get money. They may enjoy it a bit, but they won't do it for free when they could get paid for it.
The domme that organized it directly told me that the party was for people who just enjoy feet. Obviously it would be nice to have money involved but it wasn't about that. I don't think you understand the difference between lifestyle dommes and pro dommes or lifestylists in general. Everyone there was a fetish lifestylist which means they don't do it for the money. Like I said, the party doesn't have to deal with funds. It IS possible to have a party just for those who enjoy feet.
Posts: 649 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |