posted
Something new i just discovered this morning on YouTube...don't think I have ever seen this before. I also don't get it. Does the guy work for security, have a foot fetish and upload the content? Amazing how those women are zoomed in on so closely.
posted
it never ceases to amaze me the lengths that fetishists will go to in order to provide wack material for the greater number of sickos out there. and then we get to witness in real time, the number of perverts begging for more of this material where the women are completely unaware of it's usage.
what a sad day for women's right and a victory for foot fetish perversion. i don't know if i am as proud of being a foot fetish during times like these, when wacking becomes more important than morals.
quote:Originally posted by Rider Aldebaran: *reads comments on page*
Yep. Creeps praising creeps.
Might want to re-read those comments Rider. I don't see a single one praising the post.
Patrick
Are you talking about on this forum or in the link?
Because I was referring to the comments on the Youtube channel page (except for the one from SolarCrimson10, which is me), as well as in the comments section of said video.
posted
who said that was a security camera? the person filming it was obviously sitting higher than the girl playing with her feet.
-------------------- "Nina, this is my house, you work for me, and I want to suck your toes." -Big Trouble (2002) Posts: 1855 | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Keyfeet: who said that was a security camera? the person filming it was obviously sitting higher than the girl playing with her feet.
The camerawork is too steady to be anything else. And I'd think people would notice a camera on a tripod filming them from that high up; no one suspects security camera.
I bet the same kind of stuff happens with women's dressing rooms.
quote:Originally posted by Rider Aldebaran: I bet the same kind of stuff happens with women's dressing rooms.
i bet there's alot more scrutiny that goes into the monitoring or placement of cameras in a women's dressing room in the rare event when such a thing happens. pervertedness is expected to be derived from such an opportunity.
however, far fewer people expect that such pervertedness could be derived from a typical security camera where people are expected to be normally clothed.
posted
You'd be surprised to find what lengths stuff like this happened. I work security, and know for a fact that half the guys on the day shift at an old post of mine (I worked grave) would sit at the security monitor and use the cameras to ogle women as they go in and out of the facilities. Not only that, but our damn supervisor and even the security manager at the site not only let it slide, they'd do it themselves. So this guy could simply work at a place where the guards really just don't care. In security, that's a lot of places.
Now, if the client ever found out about this, that guy not only would be fired, he'd probably find himself in court explaining himself to the judge, and likely pointing fingers at everyone else as well.
Posts: 2681 | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
