posted
You can love it (like I do - well, would if I was currently attached), or hate it. It doesn't matter. I am going to venture that the original poster of this thread was wondering if he was alone in being turned on by the idea, rather than be told he shouldn't like it. It's his kink, one that more people than you know probably share. Think people are sheltered about liking feet? How many do you think would admit to be turned on by their wife/girlfriend being with another guy. I don't tell all my friends that one. I do share it here though as I feel more comfortable here with all of you because hell, you have at least one "Strange/Wierd fetish" that I do that most people don't understand.
posted
Finally a great debate thread! To the OP, I too have sometimes thought about it but just don't think I could stand it seeing it...but I DO get off on watching vids where the wife is being shared with a random guy and either the hubby is holding the camera or joins in a bit...but alas, that is as far as it will probably get for me in regards to that fantasy.
To Rider, if that is your view then stand behind it, you can't post "I'm not going to share my real opinion on it"...that's not how debates work
But seriously, "swinging" is big these days and is a question/topic that rarely gets visited on Wu's, I like seeing the feedback and debate
IP: Logged |
posted
Maybe it's just me but I'd feel queer as Hell(literally)to be in the same room with a guy with a hard-on - with or without my wife/girlfriend's feet.
quote:Originally posted by aka.footjoyboy: Maybe it's just me but I'd feel queer as Hell(literally)to be in the same room with a guy with a hard-on - with or without my wife/girlfriend's feet.
Then stay out of strip bars my friend.
Patrick
[ January 31, 2011, 11:37 PM: Message edited by: Patrick ]
posted
@ Rider Aldebaran: I'm glad you spoke your mind, I hope you won't refrain in the future just because of disagreement... I too become livid when people brag about violating others' autonomy on this site. However, I think you're conflating amoral and "deviant" behavior and I was irritated (like other posters) by what I perceived as your judgmental tone. I'm 9 years into a thoroughly satisfying polyamorous relationship, and in that time I've seen many hateful and stultifying monogamous relationships fail (even if the marriage was never formally dissolved) and several "open" relationships prosper. I think the emperors of our cultural institutions are increasingly being exposed as naked fools... I can easily think of a laundry list of scandalized hypocrites from "moral leaders" of the church and state. I hope to empower others to challenge assumptions and not delegate their responsibility for moral reasoning to millenias-old nomadic shepherds or vested interests. I'd encourage you to read "Sex at Dawn" by Christopher Ryan if you'd like to expand your ideas of what is "natural", "productive", or "traditional" about human sexual relations. If you really want to dive into the topic, check out some Richard Dawkins or Steven Pinker. Many recent discoveries/discussions in biology and anthropology challenge our conceptions not only of what sex should be, but what it was and is. Sorry to rant, but I consider the pursuit of love and sexual fulfillment a topic as important as it is loaded. Respectfully, Archie
Posts: 484 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |