posted
I don't care much for candids, either. However, all this does is shift power out of our hands. Now, it is wrong for individuals to film publicly available stuff, and right for the state to do it. It's not like the state is less creepy & corrupt than private individuals. They have all kinds of public and private photos of individuals.
Dude, it's JUST Massachusetts that banned it. There's a LONG road ahead if you think every other 49 states will follow suit..not like it's legalizing weed or anything where people will start to force this on the ballot. The part about "other intimate parts" is very vague and I would say feet candid guys better watch out lol. Luckily guys like KlassFX and I and couple others like SOS and Coedfeet who are legit don't have to worry about this type of thing affecting us. If you have to shoot candid like this guy tried, do us all a favor and and step off the top of a sky scraper please.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18306 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
Dude, it's JUST Massachusetts that banned it. There's a LONG road ahead if you think every other 49 states will follow suit..not like it's legalizing weed or anything where people will start to force this on the ballot. The part about "other intimate parts" is very vague and I would say feet candid guys better watch out lol. Luckily guys like KlassFX and I and couple others like SOS and Coedfeet who are legit don't have to worry about this type of thing affecting us. If you have to shoot candid like this guy tried, do us all a favor and and step off the top of a sky scraper please.
Awesome, we can continue being creepy out west! Thx Norcal but I think you guys are way more proper LOL. My shoots are getting wildly raunchy, and I'm just asking for feet interviews. Yesterday one of my blondes somehow managed to get her urine all over my shoe.
I'm telling you, we have more to fear from women than they do from us foot guys.
Dude, it's JUST Massachusetts that banned it. There's a LONG road ahead if you think every other 49 states will follow suit..not like it's legalizing weed or anything where people will start to force this on the ballot. The part about "other intimate parts" is very vague and I would say feet candid guys better watch out lol. Luckily guys like KlassFX and I and couple others like SOS and Coedfeet who are legit don't have to worry about this type of thing affecting us. If you have to shoot candid like this guy tried, do us all a favor and and step off the top of a sky scraper please.
Awesome, we can continue being creepy out west! Thx Norcal but I think you guys are way more proper LOL. My shoots are getting wildly raunchy, and I'm just asking for feet interviews. Yesterday one of my blondes somehow managed to get her urine all over my shoe.
I'm telling you, we have more to fear from women than they do from us foot guys.
Urine= real women's personalities now...that's a new one. I'll stick to feet...good luck on that one. I guess there's a small market for that somewhere in the world.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18306 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I know what you're thinking, but it actually was real. It wasn't like I said, "Hi I want to make a piss video." The plan was to do a 2-girl hiker feet interview, with footage of them hiking and having fun.
They showed up late and high. Their version of fun was a bit different from what I had in mind. I had no say in the matter, but I caught it. Most importantly, I got the shoes & sock strip teases and interview.
posted
I don't care for candids. Not only do they make us look bad, but they aren't sexually appealing to me anyway. That being said, I also don't agree with how the government steps in every time someone gets butthurt. Massachusetts is a nanny state anyway.
-------------------- And today we're all brothers Tonight we're all friends A moment of peace in a war that never ends Posts: 1014 | Registered: Jul 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Talos: I don't care for candids. Not only do they make us look bad, but they aren't sexually appealing to me anyway. That being said, I also don't agree with how the government steps in every time someone gets butthurt. Massachusetts is a nanny state anyway.
I used to take some when I was in my teens with a disposable camera for my own fun, not to share. Got a few pretty damn good ones. I wonder what the Sav-On drug store film developers thought when they saw my roll of film of all pointing at the ground looking at feet LOL...with that said, and time forward looking back it was pointless and the shots were risky and hard to take and happy I do it legit now where I can pose the girls any way I like and make art. When you're a kid though, even the sight of a heel pop would get you off
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18306 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
This doesn't apply to feet. If a woman wear flip flops, she's choosing to show her feet in public, so it's not sexual.
-------------------- "Nina, this is my house, you work for me, and I want to suck your toes." -Big Trouble (2002) Posts: 1855 | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
How many "intimate" parts besides breast & genitals does a woman have that could fall into this law though? If they look at your photos, they can deem them to be "jerk off material" or "sexually arousing" all they want, like Talos said..the Nanny State is here.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18306 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
![[Joint]](graemlins/joint.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
I guess there's a small market for that somewhere in the world.![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
