quote:Originally posted by Talos: I don't care for candids. Not only do they make us look bad...
Agreed.
I disagree. To single out a guy who takes a pic of a woman's feet is ludicrous. If women choose to show their naked feet in public, then it is perfectly fine to snap pictures of them in public places.
Now it's the people who take candids in private places, or of a random women's private areas, that are normally covered (upskirts).
-------------------- "Nina, this is my house, you work for me, and I want to suck your toes." -Big Trouble (2002) Posts: 1855 | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Fair Adam: Never cared for candids myself, it's an invasion of privacy, plain and simple, and yes, the creep factor goes through the roof.
posted
I am gonna chime in here. I think people are over thinking this. So you mean to tell me that just because a beautiful pair of feet are taken candidly diminishes the attractiveness of the feet? You have to be kidding me! How is a woman walking down the street in a private place? I don't see it as an invasion of privacy sorry. Up skirt I can see because you are making a conscious effort to see something that is covered up by underwear, pants etc. I think taking photos/video of feet and vagina are two very different things! I wouldn't/don't record children or up skirt which I think are wrong. I don't see the big deal with feet that are in plain view.
Posts: 84 | Registered: Nov 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I didn't realize that Cain. Never been up to that part of the country though I want to. It seems to me that the article is concerned with up skirt, which I thought was always illegal.
Posts: 84 | Registered: Nov 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I didn't realize that Cain. Never been up to that part of the country though I want to. It seems to me that the article is concerned with up skirt, which I thought was always illegal.
Posts: 84 | Registered: Nov 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by sickvik: I am gonna chime in here. I think people are over thinking this. So you mean to tell me that just because a beautiful pair of feet are taken candidly diminishes the attractiveness of the feet? You have to be kidding me! How is a woman walking down the street in a private place? I don't see it as an invasion of privacy sorry. Up skirt I can see because you are making a conscious effort to see something that is covered up by underwear, pants etc. I think taking photos/video of feet and vagina are two very different things!
That's pretty much exactly what I said earlier. But yeah I now learned that this only applies to upskirt pictures, and not feet picture. So fell free to take as many pictures of feet you want, when you go to Massachusetts.
-------------------- "Nina, this is my house, you work for me, and I want to suck your toes." -Big Trouble (2002) Posts: 1855 | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think it's low to profit off of candids. If they're done out in public for personal fun or for freebies for others, then that's not much of an issue for me. If it gets to the point where feet in public are considered a private part, then the law will require women to not wear flip flops, etc...
Posts: 735 | Registered: Apr 2013
| IP: Logged |
posted
I could never take a candid.....I cannot even imagine the embarrassment of getting caught by someone that was not happy with what you are doing.
-------------------- My girls feet in my face….ahhhhhhhh ! Posts: 2367 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well shooting candids isn't for everyone. I have been caught as I am sure others that shoot regularly have too. It comes with the territory. You have to understand there is a possibility of getting caught. I accept that. It isn't illegal so I don't sweat it. it did make me step up my game to avoid detection and so far it has worked. I am not beating up people that are against candids. You have the right to believe what you want.
Posts: 84 | Registered: Nov 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I guess it does, but if you are referring to feet as the other side(not sure what you mean so don't get offended) you shouldn't go to jail as it isn't illegal. you may be asked to leave, but you won't go to jail unless you are licking or touching which I don't recommend or do.
Posts: 84 | Registered: Nov 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by sickvik: I guess it does, but if you are referring to feet as the other side(not sure what you mean so don't get offended) you shouldn't go to jail as it isn't illegal. you may be asked to leave, but you won't go to jail unless you are licking or touching which I don't recommend or do.
According to Massachusetts law though, it says "or other intimate parts"...the cops/judge/DA can interpret that any way they like.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18303 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by sickvik: I guess it does, but if you are referring to feet as the other side(not sure what you mean so don't get offended) you shouldn't go to jail as it isn't illegal. you may be asked to leave, but you won't go to jail unless you are licking or touching which I don't recommend or do.
You can't be asked to leave a public place, for taking pictures in public. And if someone asks you to stop taking pictures in public, let them know that you are fully within your legal rights to take pictures in public.
But like I said, none of this applies to feet.
-------------------- "Nina, this is my house, you work for me, and I want to suck your toes." -Big Trouble (2002) Posts: 1855 | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
