quote:Originally posted by dicky5: Real girl on girl > real guy on girl > fake girl on girl > fake guy on girl (seen it once, a real shame).
Because it is so simple and direct, I find this to be the best response so far.
I am not certain that I agree that "real-girl-on-girl" beats "real-guy-on-girl," but it's very close. (The problem is that you really don't often see "real-girl-on-girl." You see a simulation of it.)
I agree with TylerD and you, Dicky5, that real is better. I also agree with those who point out that it's harder to "relate" to the scene when it's a girl worshiping the other girl's feet. If it's a guy doing it, I can relate as though "I'm him." That's more satisfying, to me.
-------------------- You give pleasure to the feet, you give pleasure to the person. Posts: 1297 | Registered: Jul 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
I like both, but I have to say I prefer guy-on-girl more. The one thing about girl-on-girl material is that that somebody always tries to throw the camera a seductive, come-hither look....which oddly enough, kills it for me. Focus on what you're doing, which 9 times out 10, is exactly what a guy ends up doing, as opposed to mugging for the camera. About the only time I don't mind it is if one or both parties are being humorous about it.
Posts: 2681 | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Pjay: The problem is that you really don't often see "real-girl-on-girl." You see a simulation of it.
very true, but on the rare occasion that you see a genuine version of it, the worshipping girl is often hideous.
if the end-goal is to perceive oneself in the worshipping role, why imagine ourselves as a hideous female when there are plenty of "gender-corresponding" substitutes that already exist?
aside from the fact that it makes no logical sense, i can see no other reason around it unless one has a fantasy about being a woman (which in and of itself, is more about a different kind of fetish than foot fetish persay).
the two ideas are separate fantasies (licking feet & imagining oneself as a woman) although they may happen to be combined in a girl-girl foot worship scenario.
quote:Originally posted by briar: Girl on girl just looks unnatural and fake to me.
I'll add that amateur > studio stuff as well IMO.
i'm with most people who prefer the modern day trend that is migrating more towards reality type programming, which is based on things like statistical likelihoods for the viewer(s). for me (fortunately or not), those statistical likelihoods are material that resembles my avatar
[ April 03, 2010, 07:06 AM: Message edited by: Tyler D. ]
posted
I prefer girl-on-girl. Most of these guys look unkempt, and they don't know what the hell they're doing. They show that while anyone can worship a foot, they lack any artistic element that makes the act look like something that's worth engaging in. That's where the girl-on-girl idea comes into play and saves the art of foot worshiping from the brink of extinction, boredom, and insignificance.
Girl-on-girl looks like it has some foreplay that plays a role into the act. I really, really think that most men can't worship feet properly and they discombobulate the entire meaning of how meaningful worshiping the feet of hot women can be. If I were to worship the feet of an ugly or fat girl (as unlikely as that is), I would look as distasteful as those men do in those guy-on-girl foot worship videos.
With guy-on-girl foot videos, I'm watching a bunch of rookies at work. It reminds me of amateur hour. These women are pros when it comes to worshiping another woman's feet. Girl-on-girl doesn't look so "unreal" to me. They know how to spice up the act.
The only time I don't mind seeing guy-on-girl is in regular sex porn. If I want to see Slimer from the Ghostbusters worship women's feet and see that disgusting tongue and goo infesting the poor lady's feet, then I'll see guy-on-girl.
posted
Guy on girl for sure for me. I like to put myself in that dude's perspective if I could. Girl on girl does nothing for me tbh. I hope that doesn't make me gay lol.
Posts: 707 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Mmm]](graemlins/mmm.gif)
