posted
I haven't even seen the slightest correlation. Funny thing is I find there are more attractive hands than feet. Feet seem to have more of a tendency to be unattractive to me...
Posts: 962 | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
I've always said I was attracted to pretty hands on a woman, and I do appreciate them. But when I'm honest with myself, I realize this is alomost totally based on an expectation or hope that it indicates pretty feet. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't.
quote:Originally posted by catsman: Was with a girl the other day, she was showing me a house, and she had stunning toes painted black, but her hand were awful, chewed nails, and just terrible, so that theory can be put to rest as far as I'm concerned.
I agree that hands can only marginally be relied upon to determine if the feet will be attractive. (And that means that they really can't be relied upon for it.)
But when we're talking about that, I don't think that whether her fingernails are bitten would really be an indicator or de-indicator of anything about her feet. When I size up a girl's likelihood of having nice feet based on her hands, I'm looking primarily at fingernail shape (not manicure maintenance or bitten-ness) and finger thickness and such.
I have found the whole hands-feet thing to be not reliable enough, especially since I have particular standards about toenail shape and toe shape. You really can't gauge the things that I require of her feet by looking at her hands, unfortunately.
-------------------- You give pleasure to the feet, you give pleasure to the person. Posts: 1297 | Registered: Jul 2009
| IP: Logged |