posted
"I want to know who thinks it's a big deal whether models show their faces, who is indifferent and who thinks it's a big deal (and why)."
I have already responded to this part of the thread author's initial post. As I said, I prefer to see a woman's facial features as well as her feet, and don't pay much attention to feet photos if I can't match match those pedal extremities with a woman's face.
I think it's perfectly understandable if some ladies who post here choose not to show their faces, and I don't think they should be insulted or ridiculed for doing so. I think it's equally pointless for a person to take issue with someone who isn't a fan of "faceless feet" shots.
posted
Personally, my preference is to see the face. I also respect the wishes of models who don't want to show their faces and i would never berate them for that. The ladies who post images do so for various reasons, among them, the admiration of us fans of their beauty. We should be grateful that there are many beautiful models who share their intimacies with us whether or not they show their faces. If I see feet that i'm not into or shots where I would prefer to see a face, I move on to a picture that does it for me. Theres no need to leave nasty comments and offend the model nor those who like the particular shots. That way, no harm is done. Just my thoughts. Respectfully
FFM
-------------------- "Now put your feet up here my dear, so I can lick up on them toes until the Revlon disappears" - Big Daddy Kane (For the lover in you) Twitter: @j_winnfieldbmf Posts: 1028 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
bluetoelover
unregistered
posted
I like to use my imagination for the "faceless" pics. Adds something to it...such as I can pretend that those feet are of a hot girl that I saw earlier in the day, or a girl I know etc.
As for the debate on posting face pics with the feet I have posted pics of my girls peds on here a couple of times and she asked to not have her face in the picture, which I respected. My girl does not have a job that commands respect or authority by any means, were located in a region that I know of only one footguy..who is about a 5 hour drive away in another province so were covered in that regard but we still don't feel comfortable as of yet to reveal her full identity.
This thread has been by far the most entertaining on Wu's in a long time by the way. Everyone has good arguments, High Arch, thanks for starting the debate, Mike, thanks for continiuing the debate in your awesome humor and to Perfect Peds,all I can say is wow, you have been holding your ground admirably and I am glad you realize that no one is attacking you here,nothing worse then seeing someone run off all pissed off at someone due to a misinterpration of a comment.
posted
Thank you bluetoelover! I don't see a need to get angry over a "topic" - though some comments may be directed to me and my posts - it is just that and not personal. The commentators do not KNOW me. I am open to other opinions and respect each individual's right to express theirs.
This how we learn and are exposed to ideas which we may not otherwise be exposed to.
-------------------- "People will always be tempted to wipe their feet on anything with 'welcome' written on it." Andy Partridge (now here is an idea!) Posts: 2959 | Registered: Feb 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
HAA. Interesting topic. I must say that if you are a "foot fetishist", feet should be what you're looking for. I post pics because my husband has a foot fetish. We don't feel the need to show my face in my pics, for most of the reasons that have already been stated. If you agree with them, great, if you don't move on to the pics where you can see the models face. My husband and I look at both type of pics. If we see something that is qestionable (guy or girl), we might chuckle a little and move on. I don't begrudge people who won't look at pics because my face isn't seen, but you're missing out on a great pair of feet (not just my opinion. LOL). Just my little humble opinion. You go perfectpeds!!
Posts: 51 | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
It's quite evident that faceless models are not wanted. Here's an analogy: A girl gives you a blowjob, and then right before you're about to cum she suddenly stops and tells you that you're on your own. To me that's the kind of stupid and useless games faceless models play. Faceless models give off the message that footguys are ALL freaks, living up to the negative hype the stereotypes place on us as a group of guys who would get off to just ANY foot.
Let me show you why faceless models will NEVER be the preferred types over those who do show their faces. If you go on the internet one night, go to Wus, and realize that all you see are pictures of faceless models. That's it. EVERYwhere you go, EVERY link you click on shows infinite pictures of faceless models, how long will it be before you file a complaint, or throw a fit about wanting to know who these girls are? The answer: two minutes TOPS.
On the other hand, if you go on the internet one night and all you see are pictures of models with faces attached to their bodies, how long will it be before you throw a fit? The answer: NEVER. How long will it be before you bust a nut? The answer: 17 seconds TOPS.
If all you saw were faceless models, you won't get off. For all I know, that faceless model could be an alien.
...okay, I went a bit too far with that alien comment, but you get what I mean.
How you like if all the porn you bought only shows footage of girls doing all the nasty stuff you're into WITHOUT showing the faces of the girls getting fucked? You will not be able to tolerate porn if all the DVDs you bought never shows the faces of the girls. Would you be a happy guy if the only foot porn available were headless women? No, you wouldn't.
If you can understand what I'm saying, then you just came to a realization that feet with a head attached to the rest of the body is really preferred over those without the face.
"Dlightful" mentioned earlier that "If we see something that is qestionable (guy or girl), we might chuckle a little and move on." Now, if we see the face, we wouldn't have any questions at all. We know it's a girl and Bada-bing, bada-boom no controversies.
Notice how there are never controversies when the girl shows face. Because we are all at ease.
This question was posted in the first place because someone keeps fucking around with other foot fetishists feelings.
MY FINALS WORDS: If you don't mind headless pictures, fine (I, suppose). But face in the pic, ALWAYS better.
-National
P.S. I don't buy the phony excuses as to why they don't want to show their faces either.
posted
LOL Well said. Faceless pics are LAME. It's funny that somebody would show their whole body on MySpace/Facebook, but ONLY show their feet on a foot forum site. Verrry stupid. LOL
-------------------- I'm 2nd. to God's power. I'm the semi-supreme being!
quote:Originally posted by 2nd. To God In Power: LOL Well said. Faceless pics are LAME. It's funny that somebody would show their whole body on MySpace/Facebook, but ONLY show their feet on a foot forum site. Verrry stupid. LOL
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
