posted
I agree with most people on this. My wife is ok with the looking. But for me I'm more interested in footwear as to feet so that may be a part of it too.
Posts: 1278 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think its best to do foot fetish activities with females 18 or up. Even though theres many young girls with attractive feet, It would be wise to stay away. I don't find it wrong to stare at teen girls feet as long as you control yourself.It can't be helped because if feet is beautiful, than its gonna be looked at. I myself would only deal with 18 or older because I don't want to go to prison but I admit I have glanced at younger girls feet quite a few times. Sometimes the guilt factor sets in but then I feel that as long as im not hurting the girl its fine. Since its feet and not a private part, I find nothing wrong as long as the girls are not being messed with in any sexual manner.
Posts: 6 | Registered: Jun 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
I've had this mind battle so many times, for two reasons. 1. I'm a HUGE soles man. I like them soft and perfectly soft and not cracked or calused and any way. and 2. Because I used to have a job where I was always around 14-16 girls who tend to run around barefoot....ALOT. I couldn't help but look....and I have to admit there were SO many times that I wanted to try and sneak in a hopefully seeming innocent quick tickle....but like so many of you said, there has to be a line drawn somewhere. Since I have a daughter now who is about to get to the age of tween, it just makes me think.....I would want to Hurt a guy if I thought he was lusting after her......mind battles.....I think we feet guys have it worst of all because what we LOVE is out there all the time in front of our face!!
posted
hey u know im reading this thread and have to call bs. i mean a 16 yo girl can be fucking hot as hell, im 23 and have to keep away. lets not confuse that fact. if any of you guys can really say that u didnt see a group of hot younger girls walk by and say to you freind: "Jailbait" or "damn i wish i was younger" or "two more years" than i say bullshit. there wouldnt be laws in place if men didnt consider it. and it is not unusual. until recent times it wasnt even taboo, but now that most kids mature (mentally) later in life while maturing (physically) early on, there has to be a line drawn. and i agree 100 percent. but again, 5 senses and a mind. if you only use sight and mind, whats the harm? just cuz we are footmen doesnt mean our sexual nature is so much different from others. just think about this:
vanilla people arent into feet, so when they see a young hottie whose underage, they are thinking about doing something else with that young filly which would be much worse. mainly fucking, sucking, etc.
feet? eh, theyre prolly to young to understand it anyways, yet they understand regular sex just fine. so who cares, no harm, no foul
Posts: 550 | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Where I am from technically it would be perfectly legal for a male of any age to talk to a 16 year old girl then if she consented to do what you may desire with her feet. I know my first experiences with female feet were with girls younger than 18 but as old as 16 when anything sexual happened.
To answer the is it wrong then I would agree with most that its wrong to think about actually doing anything to a girl who is underage (whatever that age is where you are) but having a look and thinking they have nice or ugly feet then walking away is fine.
Posts: 162 | Registered: May 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
I wil never persue an under agegirl... but we can't fight nature... girls that are 15 o 16 years old are usually almost fully grown physically...
mentally they re little girls and we shouldn't want to try ad be with them, but physically... we can't ignore the physical...!!! our weakness as men is that we are visual creatures... so fullgrown women are always gonna attract our attention... 15 or 16 eyar old girls may dress and act like children, because they still are, but their bodies are usually already grown enough to "distract" us... wether it be feet for us who love feet... or breasts for those who love breasts.. whatever it may be...
bottom line... they are still little girls/children inside... but the outside already looks like a women... which is what attracts our attention...
it's not wrong too look... it's also not something to be proud of, haha, but something to be discussed on a forum like this... no harm in it... as long as you look in a non-disturbing way ofcourse... and as long as you know yourself well enough to know that you aren't going to have a moment of weakness and approach a girl like that and become front page news...
quote:Originally posted by Tyler D.: [QB] there is nothing wrong with looking at the feet of a girl who is underage. afterall, they are objects which are there for the viewing. nothing illegal about noticing something that exists in real life. the problem becomes when sick men start fantasizing about these underage girls or even worse, start purusing them for their perverted pleasures. that is when it becomes wrong. looking at something is harmless, but don't sit there and drool either. us guys may have some explaining to do to the fathers of these young girls if you start doing that kind of crap. just look and don't dwell. [IMG]http://img250.imagevenue.com/loc491/th_31522_100_4872_122_0/QB]
[/QUOTE]Very good advice.
-------------------- I always thought The most sexy feet belonged to Kylie Minogue but that was before I saw my cleaner's feet. Posts: 1071 | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'd say no, but once you see that they clearly fall below the age line then at that point I look the other way.
Posts: 3496 | Registered: Aug 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think we have to acknowledge that it's perfectly normal and natural to be attracted to girls in the 15-17 age range, despite societies arbitrary 'acceptable' numbers. I'm not sure how young you mean by young, but if you're talking teen age, high school girls, then hell yeah I've had a look at their feet, among other areas. And any guy who claims he hasn't is full of shit lol The age of consent here is 16, so if I can have sex with someone, I can certainly have a discreet peak at her feet in flip flops in public and not feel guilty about that. So no need to feel guilty OP, there's no biological or physical reason NOT to be attracted to girls that age, and society deciding it's taboo is a relatively recent thing as well.
Posts: 177 | Registered: Aug 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by foot_sniffer: I think we have to acknowledge that it's perfectly normal and natural to be attracted to girls in the 15-17 age range
I don't acknowledge that at all.
It sounds like a slippery slope to me. Not one I want to be on. And it's "perfectly" normal and natural when you're in high school and college.
Before you deride the age limits as "arbitrary", try pointing us to something that disproves the legitimacy of them.
Posts: 2828 | Registered: Jun 2010
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Tongue]](tongue.gif)
The age of consent here is 16, so if I can have sex with someone, I can certainly have a discreet peak at her feet in flip flops in public and not feel guilty about that. 
