quote:Originally posted by combine_hunter: I don't acknowledge that at all.
You don't acknowledge that there is no biological or physical reason whatsoever for a guy not to be attracted to a sexually mature female? Hmm how interesting.
Posts: 177 | Registered: Aug 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by combine_hunter: A girl who's 15-17 may be sexually mature, but she's not emotionally mature.
That's an important consideration, even if you're ignoring the fact that they're not legal.
Age of consent laws are different all over. In the U.S. alone, they range from 16 to 18. Here in Michigan the AoC is 16. In some places its lower than 15.
quote:Originally posted by combine_hunter: A girl who's 15-17 may be sexually mature, but she's not emotionally mature.
That's an important consideration, even if you're ignoring the fact that they're not legal.
Age of consent laws are different all over. In the U.S. alone, they range from 16 to 18. Here in Michigan the AoC is 16. In some places its lower than 15.
quote:Originally posted by combine_hunter: A girl who's 15-17 may be sexually mature, but she's not emotionally mature.
That's an important consideration, even if you're ignoring the fact that they're not legal.
And really you can't set laws based on emotional maturity. I've known people who are emotionally mature at 14, and 20 year olds who are no where near maturity. And as I said, age of consent here in washington state is 16, some areas it's higher, so it's lower. Hell it's 12 in the Vatican, which is a bit fucked up in my opinion lol. My whole point is that sexual attraction to girls this age is normal, but wether or not you should pursue anything depends on the laws where you live, the persons maturity etc. But please don't go do a 12 year old in the Vatican, because, just no.
Posts: 177 | Registered: Aug 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by combine_hunter: A girl who's 15-17 may be sexually mature, but she's not emotionally mature.
That's an important consideration, even if you're ignoring the fact that they're not legal.
Age of consent laws are different all over. In the U.S. alone, they range from 16 to 18. Here in Michigan the AoC is 16. In some places its lower than 15.
Wasn't Texas something ridiculous like 13?
As far as I know, it's 18.
Of course, that might not be statewide. And it's possible you have us confused with Kentucky or Alabama.
Posts: 2828 | Registered: Jun 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
i'm still young (21), i like all feet (mature, younger girls) from 16 years the feets are very pretty in my opinion. for me its not very wrong but a older guy like 30/40 it can be a problem if he like very underage feet.
Posts: 152 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Toe-fu: It seems there are a lot of people here who have a phobia against anything under 18, even though they themselves are attracted to it.
If a 45 year old man mentions feet (or ass, or whatever) of an 18 year old, that's fine.
If a 19 year old mentions feet of a 16 year old. OMFGPERVERTPEDOFILE!!!
It's the law, but still, it's not like you're talking about 5 year olds. These girls (16,17) hit puberty a long time ago and are aware of their sexuality. With the way women are dressing nowadays, who's to blame? THE MEN OR THE GIRLS OR THEIR PARENTS?... 12 year olds in this generation are walking around in high heels, lipstick, hairdo, etc trying their best to look older. How do their parents allow them to do such a thing?
This really is an odd thing, and yes I fully agree with it.
Hell, anyone over 18 can talk about an 18 year olds feet and its fine. I remember when a friend of mine was 19 and was dating a 16 year old. In our country that's totally fine. 16 is the age of consent (or is it 15 now?) but it was abso-friggin-hilarious to read the comments when he posted this on a forum. American members went mad! Talking about how God will be waiting for him, etc.
For the record I'm 25 and my girlfriend is 25. I've never dated anyone more than a year younger or older than me, nor would I want to.
But the point of the matter is that, for normal people (not paedos), we're attracted to what we want to mate with. A child can not mate. I'd say the age of consent should be 14, because that's when we used to have sex. Before the bible and stuff came along we used to have sex and children at those ages.
Posts: 219 | Registered: Oct 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by kingler: I'd say the age of consent should be 14, because that's when we used to have sex. Before the bible and stuff came along we used to have sex and children at those ages.
posted
I keep my looking at mature women feet, but if I see what I think is a younger looking female and she is barefooted. I just look and turn my head because I think it is just wrong.